Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 2 - Panthers Select Nic Scourton at pick 51


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, chknwing said:

carolina literally traded  a bag of doritos to pick him

I wouldn’t say that. We moved back in almost every single round 10+ picks. I do like Nic Scourton though for where we drafted him at. He has an array of pass rush moves. Great motor and great vs the run. Early on in the draft process he was mocked in the first round in every mock I looked at. Facts are at 51, any prospect that you draft is going to have a few concerns.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Osaka Panther said:

only 5 sacks and 1 forced fumble?

fml

He won't play like that, look more at his Purdue tape. He weighed 280-285 at TAM last year playing a containment end for them. He's at 257 now, the weight he played at Purdue. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 years old, bulked up to play the "containment" role at A&M, still had 5 sacks, trimmed 20 lbs off for the combine, and his comps have been Trey Hendrickson and George Karlaftis. Not to mention the guy's character is top notch. Love it.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Osaka Panther said:

if another man can influence you as a man, i got some bad news for you lol

Not about influence in that way in my opinion.  One guy can definitely rub everyone the wrong way and kill the vibe.

Never had that type of guy around you on a team or job?  Maybe that guy is you 😛 

  • Pie 1
  • The D 1
  • Flames 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...