Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ex-Panthers great Steve Smith sued under 'homewrecker law' for alleged affair.


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, La Pantera said:

She can use the same law to go after her own husband (He’s the one with money) during any divorce settlement.

 

 

I'm pretty sure the spirit of this law is to go after the other party, not the spouse. Plus she will be getting a lot more than 100k from Smitty if she divorces him. Suing her would be bonus money and a nice revenge factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fox007 said:

Why do guys even want to sleep with another married person instead of a single person if you are going to cheat in the first place? so bizarre to even want sloppy seconds like ooof lost respect for Smitty on that one

I think if you are willing to cheat on your own spouse, you don't really care if the other person is married or not.  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

It is an antiquated law that basically treats the woman as the husband's property.  We will never hear about this again because Smitty will likely write the check--and the lawyers know it.

Most of the cases I have heard of involve one woman suing another woman for messing around with her husband.  I think in this case, the guy is going after Steve because he knows Steve is wealthy.  Otherwise, they would probably just divorce and be done with it.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not in a million fuging years would I have been dumb enough to allow butthurt to convince me to publicly release THAT text. LOLOLOL 

One of the worst self owns I've ever seen.

That man obviously has no real friends.

Ain't no way in the hell I'd let one of my boys make something like that public knowledge.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, 332nd said:

That man obviously has no real friends.

Ain't no way in the hell I'd let one of my boys make something like that public knowledge.

 

Seriously. Like bruh, I know you're hurt right now and you're mad and you want to get back at 'em, but let's just think this through first because this is NOT gonna be a good look for you. LOL 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Fox007 said:

Why do guys even want to sleep with another married person instead of a single person if you are going to cheat in the first place? so bizarre to even want sloppy seconds like ooof lost respect for Smitty on that one

less likely be told on. At the end of the day, 100k seems like chump change to make this go away if his wife is on board, which I think is going to continue fine based on his wife not leaving him yet either and him back on streaming.

Edited by thunderraiden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My late Momma said to me more than once growing up:

’You can make your life easy or you can make your life hard.  It is your choice   Choices can have consequences that you will pay for so choose wisely’

Smitty is a grown ass man.  He is going to  pay  a very large price   Not my business.         i hope he gets his poo together 

i am a ‘keep life simple and live up to my obligations’ kinda person 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

My late Momma said to me more than once growing up:

’You can make your life easy or you can make your life hard.  It is your choice   Choices can have consequences that you will pay for so choose wisely’

Smitty is a grown ass man.  He is going to  pay  a very large price   Not my business.         i hope he gets his poo together 

i am a ‘keep life simple and live up to my obligations’ kinda person 

Your momma was a wise woman.

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...