Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKiNG NEWS: Panthers interested in trading for Trey Hendrickson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The Bears may have won the trade, but neither team has much to show for it. 

 

I think Parsons is great, but unless we are one player away from being a SB contender, i avoid that deal like the plague.

I wouldn't call that great criteria for a trade(SB contention). If that's the criteria than probably 99.9% of all NFL trades have failed. 

Mack was the better contributor versus what he was traded for. That's the most basic criteria, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I wouldn't call that great criteria for a trade(SB contention). If that's the criteria than probably 99.9% of all NFL trades have failed. 

Mack was the better contributor versus what he was traded for. That's the most basic criteria, IMO.

I would. IMO, you only make a trade like that if it makes you a SB contender.  If it doesn't, then it was a waste of assets.  Had Chicago not made the trade, they might have gotten good players cheaper.

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Navy_football said:

Yeah, but those receivers though. 

I really thought that laying Higgins was a mistake. Not that he isn't a legit 1B WR, it's just that you only have so much cap to go around and you already have a QB and another WR making mega bucks with a trash tier OL and D. Seemed like the perfect candidate for a tag and trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They also didn't mind it last year during four nations, or when they beat the fins lol. Sour grapes, they had 3 pf the top four players in the world on the ice when we beat them.
    • The tag for '26 is 28M. No way they tag him.  He is projected to be worth around 60M for 3 years so they could still try to sign him on an extension for about that amount: JagsWire   As someone else mentioned, the tag average factors in outside linebackers, aka, edge rushers, in the line backer formula.  If they would distinguish between olb and ilb, the ilb would get a lot less. 
    • He didn't actually make the playoffs. We had several opportunities to clinch on our own and crapped the bed. We had to wait for Atlanta to win to get us in. We had the tie breaker in a poo division that had 3 teams finish 8-9.  If you go back and look at the games we played, we weren't a dominant offensive team under him as an OC. We beat the Jets 13-7 and barely beat the packers after they failed to convert multiple red zone trips. We relied heavily on converting 4th downs. DC was also extremely slow at recognizing trends in game and was really lacking with clock management.  Was there progress this year? Yes. But most of it was on the defensive side of the ball. Our offense was stagnant with a couple of exceptions. Any improvement from Bryce was minimal and he kept insisting on XL over Coker, and even RB distribution instead of going with the hot hand.  He may be building something, but I don't think we've seen enough to know what that is. It could go either direction. If he insists on being OC, then without a noticeable improvement, yes he needs to be on the hot seat like any OC would. The more jobs you take on the more you have to be judged on. I think he would have a longer leash if he hired a true OC and just focused in being HC.   
×
×
  • Create New...