Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers possibly trading Thielen?

philit99

By philit99,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The list goes...

Smitty

 

 

Moose

 

 

 

 

 

DJ Moore

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOLOLOLOL

Seriously, our 4th leading all-time WR is Mark Carrier with 2547 yards. That's CRAZY.

TMac going to be 4th by 2029

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPcavedweller Grand Master

CPcavedweller

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

I can tell you they 100% answered and the compensation is a day three pick. lol 

Good, tell them to kick rocks for that. It's that simple. You don't trade your best receiver in a year where you are pushing for the playoffs, with two young guys as your up and comers. Adam's value is on the field and off, and no one can replace that. 

You trade that away in Week 9 if you find yourself 2-6. Not before the year starts. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

TMac going to be 4th by 2029

By the end of 2029, he should have passed Moore's 5,201 and be sitting only behind Smitty, Moose, and Olsen.

EDIT: realized you might have meant this as 4th overall, some of the other posts were just about rankings among WRs and excluding TEs and RBs

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Good, tell them to kick rocks for that. It's that simple. You don't trade your best receiver in a year where you are pushing for the playoffs, with two young guys as your up and comers. Adam's value is on the field and off, and no one can replace that. 

You trade that away in Week 9 if you find yourself 2-6. Not before the year starts. 

No I'm telling you that they answered and have been talking about a trade for the last two days and AT is being moved and the compensation for him is a day 3 pick from Minny. The trade is nearly done already. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted

I mean. Thielen being here or not being here is not going to push us in or out of the playoffs. That will come down to Bryce not regressing but taking huge strides and the young roster developing and Canales and his staff not getting outcoached. 35 year old Adam Thielen is not a needle mover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
amcoolio Veteran

amcoolio

Posted
Posted

I don't get trading him for a late round pick, which we have historically been very bad at making. The return will amount to be 0 and just trading your best receiver last year for nothing. Trade him for depth piece at corner or linebacker, which we desperately need. Vikings have a ton of depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WUnderhill Grand Master

WUnderhill

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

No I'm telling you that they answered and have been talking about a trade for the last two days and AT is being moved and the compensation for him is a day 3 pick from Minny. The trade is nearly done already. lol

Source? Sorry if already posted in the past 12 pages. Also, if this is the case, hoping “Day 3” means 4th round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...