Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Now imagine two of these guys next to eachother...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

But one is all we need!  We needs more DE's cause the huddles resident GM's says so!

Seriously though, we just upgraded the pass rush big time.  I was more worried about the DT depth than the DE's.  I'm encouraged to hear big Dave say he has faith in the young guys so it seems they will get a shot to prove their worth.

If a hand full of these guys at DE and  "conner" take advantage of the opportunity that they have then I can't help but think this will improve the overall defense for a long time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how do you game plan to stop that? teams had enough trouble with just one last year.

and then add in solid DEs we have (including the pass rush poential we have in delaire and also ealy (for whom i think the switch turned on towards the end last year).

and then add in the LB corps we have (including the potential we have as a pass rusher in cash).

a front and pass rush like this makes the job easy for DBs. our secondary will look good because of the pressure on the QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Provided that Kony continues his upward trend I think we'll be fine at DE 

Kony would have had better numbers but they played Jared Allen more than they should have, IMO. 

I agree---year 3 for DEs is when you see them.  But we have never had good DE play without solid DT play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now imagine a 6'1" CB with 33 3/8 wingspan, partnered with a 6'1" CB with the same wingspan. 

Now imagine a 6'5 240lb WR with 34 7/8" wingspan, partnered with a 6'4" 232 lb WR with a 33 3/8" wingspan

Now imagine a 6'5" 255 lb TE, partnered with a 6'4" 253 lb TE with 34 1/4" wingspan. 

Now imagine a 6'5" 250lb QB to lead that team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Gettleman says he's a pass rusher and that man knows defensive linemen, but Short had 19.5 sacks and 49.5 tackles for loss while playing in the Big 10 vs. Butler's 5 sacks and 28.5 tackles for loss playing in C-USA. Butler may have a lot of potential, but Short was the far more productive college player and he did it vs. better competition.

I'm excited about Butler's potential, but I won't be surprised if he's a bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I love  almost everything  we did in the offseason but we still have Bryce.  They have to be favored.     Sorry I just can’t see him as an asset yet.  His first chance to prove me wrong.    And WIliams was a LOT better last year than 2024.  He will probably still be getting better before he hits his plateau.  
    • Outside of both having very good straight line speed, I don't see much in common. Chark was mostly a play action Chuck it deep type of receiver. Brazzell, while raw with route running, is fully capable of running most routes. He is way better at using his body to shield defenders from the ball than chark and does a better job attacking the ball and creating a wide catch radius. Agree Brazzell will need to prove he can beat the press and I imagine he will see a lot of it when he is on the field. I still think he has quite a bit of development to go through (particularly with his route running, press beat techniques, and reading zone coverage), so I don't expect to see him on the field much this year (barring injuries)
    • Probably closer to a PK. Can't see -2.5 for us 
×
×
  • Create New...