Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Browns take 2 QBs?


Recommended Posts

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/browns-have-reportedly-considered-drafting-two-quarterbacks-with-high-round-picks/

I don't think they would do it but if they did how would it mess up the draft for everyone.  Seems players we are targeting would rise up the board.

I could see them taking Barkley 1st and whoever remains standing at QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t see this ever happening but it is the Browns we’re talking about

I thinks it’s more probable that Cleveland is floating this rumor on purpose so that they get a desperate team to trade up to pick #4. Especially since some teams feel the top tier of QBs consists of 4 guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a terrible idea if they are thinking of using both #1 and #4 on QBs. In that regard, you automatically lose one impact player, as only one QB can be on the field at the same time. They could easily get a QB and another potentially high impact guy (Barkley, Chubb, Fitzpatrick, etc.). Now, if they are talking using either #1 or #4 plus a second or third round pick, that would potentially make more sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would be pretty stupid tbh. Shows a complete lack of scouting. I could see a cluster fug. They'd be switching back and forth never settling on one guy. The QB room would breed tension and a lack of faith in either QB. They need to figure out who their guy is. Draft him #1, then take Barkley at #4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am in Cleveland for a week (about 50 miles below it)--I have spoken to some Browns fans.  People, these fans are something else.  I felt like the new member of the platoon joining a group of soldiers who have seen everything war has to offer.  They feel that Josh Allen is a mistake.  They want Darnold at #1 or Mayfield at #4. 

One compared this draft to the Richardson/Manziel draft.  I told him that Farmer is no longer the Browns GM--but he added that the owner is the problem.  I replied, "no, your last owner was the problem (Modell)."

Imagine having the cap room and the free agents they have coming in, the draft picks, and still feeling nearly hopeless.  I asked everyone what they hoped for--All said between 4 and 6 wins.  One crackhead said 9 wins is a lock.

I think they will win 6 to 7.  For this place, that might  be enough to restore faith.  The fan base has been taken off life support, and with the Indians and Cavs, the Browns are easy to forget.  I want them to have a great draft and play well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

I read this yesterday... and i can honestly say I would not blame the browns if they did it.  They have been whiffing on quarterbacks for years. Bring in two guys to compete and trade the left over.

actually a good idea. They have plenty of picks, and this would ensure them plenty next year as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hotsauce said:

 hypothetically, would you take a deal from for CAM if the Browns if gave us:

2018 2x 1st picks

2019 1st pick

2020 1st pick

And their pro bowl Guard Joel Bitonio

Why would you trade a Pro-Bowl QB in the prime of his career?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...