Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More missed tackles.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Ron Rivera allows complacency. Promotes an assistant that is in over his head, this unaccountable mentality trickles down to an unmotivated and ill-prepared defense. This team is going to lose to a team that is trying to tank. I can’t see how they can keep anyone on the defensive coaching staff after the Panthers falter down the stretch because of a historically awful defense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's what happens when you hire the assistant of the assistant of a DC. Players are constantly out of position trying to do too much, which results in more missed tackles. This Eric Washington experiment needs to end sooner than later. He is not cut out for the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

So, what is the deal with so many missed tackles lately? Hard to blame a coordinator for that. Players practice tackling every single day.

Seems like everyone out there is struggling. 

True

But as they do that in practice everyday.  Why is it not being fixed in practice? Thats on the coaches

 

Why is it not being hammered during the fiom sessions? Thats on the coaches 

 

I refuse to think the guys, who have been on this D and looked Elite in the past just completely forgot how to play.  Like the Monstars took away their ability as they did in spacejam

 

The coaches arent doing their job.  These same guys didnt forget how to tackle or rush the passer under Withers and Mcdermott, hiw all of a sudden soon as a new coach comes in they look liie completely different players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...