Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith destroys Donte Jackson in FNZ interview


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

Didn’t see this posted, Smitty was on FNZ yesterday and had some pretty strong words for DJ... said he should change his name from Action to just Jackson, called him soft and said he retired because he couldn’t play with the “sensitive” players you see in the NFL now. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Don't know if this is a call out or just a straight slam.

Smith called out DJ Moore and got effort. I'm not so sure that works with Donte Jackson.

Unless he’s matured leaps and bounds from last year all it’s going to do is get his pantries in a wod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Jackson would probably make an amazing nickel. Not sure if he is cut out for outside corner long term.

I'm honestly not so sure on that. On running plays, you gotta be able to step up and be physical at the LOS as a nickel because you're now essentially operating as the third LB vs. the run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Don't know if this is a call out or just a straight slam.

Smith called out DJ Moore and got effort. I'm not so sure that works with Donte Jackson.

Eh dj always gave effort. I think that was more directed towards curtis. Who has played soft as hell this year and seemingly has stopped on routes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...