Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What was your first Hornets Game you attended?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

I moved to Charlotte in early 1990, just after Hugo.  I either attended a game at the end of the 89-90 season or beginning of 90-91 season.  My aunt would get tickets through her job for all kinds of things, including Hornets games.  This was the beginning of my Charlotte sports fandom.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waaaay more Hornets games than Panthers games for sure.

I was at the Celtics playoff game when Zo tipped in the last shot. I was at a couple of the Kobe games when we kept beating them.

I was at that Bobcats game when Matt Carrol went off while we were leaving, we had to turn back around because the crowd was going crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/3/2021 at 10:05 PM, Shocker said:

I was at opening night.  Man, the Hive was so damn great back then.  Good times.

I was there too--remember those souvenir tickets in plexiglass that they gave out?  Remember people wearing tuxedos?  Remember Cleveland handing us about a 40 point loss to a standing ovation?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I was there too--remember those souvenir tickets in plexiglass that they gave out?  Remember people wearing tuxedos?  Remember Cleveland handing us about a 40 point loss to a standing ovation?

Yeah and the limos...all that.  lol.  It was pretty damn awesome

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One and only Hornets game I attended was a Saturday afternoon game in 1994. Sat in the wrong seats and the usher said, "No, you're down here..." and we ended up sitting right behind Bill Walton doing the color for whatever TV station. Alonzo, Dell Curry, Grandmama, Mugsy, and Robert "The Chief" Parish was finishing up his career after all his great years in Boston.

Great thing about being that close is hearing all the trash talk.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...