Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC and Shaq restructured

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

MasterAwesome Veteran

MasterAwesome

Posted
Posted

"Oh my godddd it's like Hurney all over again!!!"

Or maybe...just maybe.......Hurney did things (some of which were very stupid) that every GM in the league does.  It'll be even more hilariously ironic if we end up drafting Parsons at 8th overall...even though I have it on good authority Hurney is the only GM in the history of the NFL who has ever drafted a LB or RB in the first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mickey Loomis is 178-126 as an NFL GM. The Panthers are 200-215-1 as a franchise. One gets the benefit of the doubt due to success while the other has a lot to prove. 

So I assume your position is that if you are winning then do it by any means necessary but if you are losing then the cap issues are just more problems and not justified?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

GoOd ThInG wE hAvE a Rb AnD lB uNdEr CoNtRaCt!

pepsi GIF

There are mind numbingly stupid people in this thread. It’s like they think if you keep doing the same fuging thing we’ve done we’ll somehow see different results. We are a mediocre franchise and these are mediocre moves. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
Just now, TheRumGone said:

There are mind numbingly stupid people in this thread. It’s like they think if you keep doing the same fuging thing we’ve done we’ll somehow see different results. We are a mediocre franchise and these are mediocre moves. 

What are you talking about??? It not like theres history with these moves. Or the fact how other teams pay ILBs and RBs. Trends are dumb too, future learning my ass! Im not stoopid YOURE THE STOOPID ONE!!!1!1!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

So I assume your position is that if you are winning then do it by any means necessary but if you are losing then the cap issues are just more problems and not justified?

No. My position is that if you've proven that you can field a consistent winner you probably know what you're doing. Hopefully our crew will soon be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

There are mind numbingly stupid people in this thread. It’s like they think if you keep doing the same fuging thing we’ve done we’ll somehow see different results. We are a mediocre franchise and these are mediocre moves. 

In fairness, we could end up being wrong on our takes of this....but this just seems so disturbingly familiar. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, SmartyHurney3 said:

What the fug are you talking about you moron. Who cares about his injury. CMC is a stat whore for a position that typicall costs late round picks or a FA singing to be competitive at. He's failed numerous times with the game on his shoulders to score or gain 2 yards for a first down. He's a net negative. He does too much that is not his primary role, and too little at his primary role. The Panthers need 2 runningbacks because of his short yardage weakness. 

His contract is absurd.

Well then the GM that wrote it must be an absolute moron, right? 🙂

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Roger all that. Do you think BY avoided any sacks last game? This oline is not what you're touting them to be. They are much better then 2023! Much much much better than 2023. But come on now, you'd expect this expensive oline (most are run blocking specialist) to at least dominate in the run game every game.  And... I keep telling you our WRs and TEs are not that good yet. I mean last Sunday was a prime example. Our receiving targets never make plays like those. Never. And this is from one of the worst teams in the league. Shough could have easily had 3 INTs if not for his receivers making plays on the ball. Our guys just don't do that. XL almost allowed an INT backing up out of bounds instead of coming to the ball. And everyone would have blamed that on BY. That's why he doesn't throw to that dude. I can't recall a game except maybe the second Falcons game - maybe, where I thought our receivers could possibly be better than the other team's. I think TMac and Coker have a lot of potential. But they're aren't consistent. But they're young and WILL improve. I'm confident of that.  I don't agree that BY was drafted to only stand in the pocket. He has always been best off schedule - for better or worse. 
    • ForJimmy
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Do you think you will get a direct answer?  Icky giving up 5 pressures (playing hurt in his defense) by himself and Bryce only getting sacked once tells you he played well in the pocket.  He extended plays and converted some tough downs.  
    • frankw
      What gets this team past this?

      By frankw · Posted

      I've been very apprehensive about potentially firing yet another head coach. But Canales needs to focus on being a head coach first and foremost and begin handing off some responsibilities like playcalling duties and begin overseeing the entire team or we need to assess all possible ideal HC candidates in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...