Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Wizard Adam Schefter confirms that 4 QBs will be gone by pick 7!!!!!


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Snake said:

Doing nothing sometimes has it's rewards. 

If the so called experts are correct and there are 4 qbs take in the top 7 then we are sitting pretty at 8.  

The odds that all 4 qbs taken end up being franchise qbs is astronomical. Take the best tackle on the board and don't look back. 

Go after Watson next year if they must.

Edited by Jon Snow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

Thats one hell of a combo. Irish and Scottish both known to be some tough fighting scrappy bad asses. I bet she argues like hell when she wanted to.

Let's just say the Irish part of her was strong 😕

24 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

I'm half Irish, and half Scot...which means I like to drink but I don't like to pay for it.

That's probably a pretty accurate description 😆

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I like the thought of Lance, I like his skill set.  But you are fooling yourself if you think he is anywhere ready to play in the NFL for numerous reasons.  Its going to take him a couple seasons at least just to adjust to the speed.  If we take him at 8 (after careful evaluation) then I hope to hell we have a long term plan for him instead of throwing him to the wolves.  And also that is why in my mind some of these mocks have Jones to us because he is ready to play day 1.

Well, originally that's why we added Teddy for 3 years with the opt out before year 3. If we draft Lance, he can sit and learn for at least 2 season and we at least have an average QB. If that does happen I personally think Lance will take the job before that. I have a good feeling about Lance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Would be the first time in the history of the league 4 QBs went in the first 7 picks. 

I'll believe it when I see it. 

 

That said I somehow could easily 100% see 4 QBs go in the first 8 after our pick so who knows.

I just don't see ATL taking a QB given the recent commitment to Ryan by restructuring which makes him uncuttable or untradeable for several years. MIA and Cincy aren't taking one. Eagles ownership wants the team to build around Hurts so I could see them passing for a QB and the Lions have Goff with a massive contract and no WRs. 

While each of those teams could trade out, I dont see a team giving up multiple 1st round picks to move up for the 3rd or 4th best QBs in the draft. 

I agree with you. I'm not convinced the Jets will take a QB either and after them I would be shocked if 3-7 took a QB. I also don't think there's anyone to trade up above us either. I doubt more than 2 qbs will be drafted before 8. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...