Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Orlovsky on Trey Lance


Troys99x4
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ahh, the age old tearing down of guys.  Keep it up NFL types!  Break down Trey more and more.  Make him stick around to 8 so we can snag him 😃

Trey isn't ready to jump in feet first.  Instead, let him sit behind Bridgewater for a half a season or more.  Then let's get the machine rolling!

Nothing mentioned is KILLER.  All these QBs have flaws that need to be fixed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Developing a QB is very, very different than developing a CB.  It's different honestly than any other position.  Those guys who can develop NFL QB's are rare, not nearly enough of them around.  I don't know if we have that guy on staff.  Joe Brady can construct a passing game, absolutely no doubt.  But that's still very different than developing a QB.

The fact that Lance is playing FCS football is already a strike.  It makes all that running he did frankly irrelevant to me.  If that's his NFL game, I don't want him.

If someone can fix those mechanics, great.  But even I could spot his flaws.  Lazy feet, inconsistent drops.  I hope our staff is better now, but we never fixed those things with our last franchise QB - also a physically talented runner - and we ruined him.  I don't want to see that ever again.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lance is the number 4 QB in this draft.  He is a project QB and will need time. Usually these QBs go in the bottom half of the first round.  I am not big at taking him at 8, but we might have to because of the demand on QB.  In actuality I hope he is gone by 8 so we can dodge this bullet and get BPA at a position of need. There is a lot of teir 1 talent that can have an immediate impact on this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oddly feeling really good about tonight. fug the heat
    • Here are my takeaways from the conference (IMO): - Is Dan against taking a WR 3 years in a row? No. Would that be his preference? Also, no. Not by a long shot.  - I think draft gurus are wrong. Tight end is not an early priority. They like the guys in the building enough to see them develop, but a later round guy is being looked at (just seemed like he was able to label a couple of guys "talented", but stopped short of suggesting the class is good at the top. Seemed quick to talk about the depth of the class) - If we are taking a DL, it will be in the top 2 rounds. They fall off a cliff at some point soon after. - They are targeting guys in each round. I think we are more likely to move up than down in this draft to prevent missing out on a guy. He doesn't want to give up a lot though, man loves his draft picks. - DBs are a priority. We want to come away with a safety and a nickel. Maybe even a safety that can play nickel. Thieneman sounds more and more like a real possibility, if he is there. We are taking a safety in the first 2 rounds, if I had to put money on it. - Age matters more for 1st round picks, probably (Mesidor), but not for after that (Stukes). - They have a guy or two that they want in the 1st round, but crazy things DO happen in the draft, and they may shift gears and take a different guy if someone falls that they didn't expect to be there.  - Character matters. A LOT. If a guy has character concerns of any kind, you can be pretty confident they aren't on our board. They may bring in a guy or two for a visit to gauge the validity/severity of the concern though.      
    • Yeah don't wanna see anyone get hurt.  Hopefully Chatters is sitting.
×
×
  • Create New...