Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers "focused in" on Pitts?

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Verge said:

I think it is silly, but I do know they will try and get Pitts. Wouldn't be surprised with an Alabama WR either. 

I think fans are totally overlooking the chance we could go WR at some point in the draft. 

Fans tend to think in current year terms, but both Moore and Anderson are in the last year of their contracts.  Even if they extend Moore you have a huge hole across from him.  

Also people need to remember that WR1, WR2, and WR3 are all basically starters.  Good teams, the type you end up facing in the playoffs, can often take away your first option.

I don't mind a WR early, I think it is a high value position, but for various reason there seems to be some really good value in the 2nd and 3rd with receivers lately, and this years class is deep again.

 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
YourLastThought Mentor

YourLastThought

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, MHS831 said:

You see, the problem with this Huddle thing is we read stuff that was influenced by other stuff and we, collectively, usually dwindle a complex process down to 2 or 3 options when there are dozens.  We focus on what we THINK we need and what we want to hear...If you agree with someone, they are right--if you disagree, they are stupid. 

So we lose focus and fail to think divergently--we are trained to solve problems convergently.  So instead of considering all of the possible scenarios and strategies, we try to use logic and a process of elimination based on subjective rationale to narrow the scope from an examination of the options to a narrowing of choices.

So there's that.

Holy poo that was a lot to absorb at once but I agree with you're saying for sure.

Cosmo Kramer Yes GIF

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Verge said:

I think it is silly, but I do know they will try and get Pitts. Wouldn't be surprised with an Alabama WR either. 

Going a True Bpa at 8 would not surprise me one bit.  And a Bama WR wouldn’t shock me either.

 

I know a few People that have Waddle as high as #3 overall and WR1 in this draft.

people forget about him because he missed most the season due to injury and Smith went off when he went about.

 

remember.  Even with Jerry Jeudy, Ruggs, and Smith.  Waddle still stood out and all honestly, whenever Bama needed a big clutch play, Waddle was the one who made it.

 

 

just to jog people’s memory

Week 1

a. 8 catches for 134 2TDs

b. 8 catches for 89yds 0TDs

 

week 2

a. 5 catches 141 1TD

b. 6 catches 63 1TD

 

week 3

a.  6 catches 120 0TD

b. 13 catches 164 1TD

 

week 4

a. 6 catches 161 1TD

b. 11 catches 167 2TDs


 

a. Is Waddle 

b. Is Smith 

through the 1st 4 games prior to Waddle’s injury.

 

Edited by ncfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Verge said:

I think it is silly, but I do know they will try and get Pitts. Wouldn't be surprised with an Alabama WR either. 

Most good teams are draft receivers every year or 2. Can't sit back and ignore talent. 

Gotta build the te, and that doesn't happen by skipping over talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DavidEng
      Canes vs Flyers Gm 3 Rd 2 8pm

      By DavidEng · Posted

      It’s like being on the Flyers broadcast team feed so far
    • philit99
      Canes vs Flyers Gm 3 Rd 2 8pm

      By philit99 · Posted

      Boy the flyers look good early. Lots of bad plays and slow start by our team. Hope that changes before the score changes.
    • strato
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By strato · Posted

      I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes into account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as another treading water year (at QB). I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. That’s how I look at it. 
×
×
  • Create New...