Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Watsons Lawyer Came With Receipts


Jorgie
 Share

Recommended Posts

I will reserve judgement until this settles (if it even does) but some interesting notes:

-Only 2 lawsuits claim forced sexual incidents took place

-Of the 2 that were sexual in nature, for 1 (the lesbian therapist), Watson's attorneys pose that they have damning receipt-based evidence (or) other people providing information counter to her filings.

-One showed up at his door unannounced to give him an extra massage

-Another would text & offer him to a massage after his games

-Still though, it doesn't mean this is all a farce.  He very well may have crossed the lines from a professional standpoint and furthermore, clearly has a porn-inspired massage fetish.  I think the snowballing of cases could lead this to backfire on the plaintiffs and the legitimate ones may get lumped in with the false ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Or maybe have a paid professional on staff, rather than umpteen random women who you contact through IG.

This is the most correct answer.

Watson would be well advised to stick with the Texans massage therapist going forward.  

Edited by NanuqoftheNorth
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea a big red flag to me was continuing working with him after these alleged sexual encounters. It doesn’t mean he’s innocent but it punches a big hole in the prosecutions case if it comes to that. Reminds me of the kobe money grab honestly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RJK said:

Yea a big red flag to me was continuing working with him after these alleged sexual encounters. It doesn’t mean he’s innocent but it punches a big hole in the prosecutions case if it comes to that. Reminds me of the kobe money grab honestly 

Kobe admitted to raping that woman.

"The facts are not up for interpretation: On June 30, 2003, at the Lodge & Spa at Cordillera in Eagle, Colorado, Kobe invited a 19-year-old employee of the spa into his room after she’d shown him around the facility. They began kissing consensually, but when he took off his pants, she tried to leave. He then groped her, ignored her multiple requests to leave, choked her hard enough to leave bruises on her neck, physically blocked her from leaving the room, ignored more of her requests to stop, and forcibly penetrated her, only stopping when she aggressively resisted. “Every time I said no he tightened his hold around me,” she told police. The day after, a nurse observed the woman and, according to a detective from the sheriff’s office, “stated that the injuries were consistent with penetrating genital trauma. That it’s not consistent with consensual sex.”

“Although I truly believe this encounter between us was consensual, I recognize now that she did not and does not view this incident the same way I did. After months of reviewing discovery, listening to her attorney, and even her testimony in person, I now understand how she feels that she did not consent to this encounter.”

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Tin-foil hat time, folks! 

 

Gotta love it when someone (who more than likely is using either a burner account or was previously banned) uses his first post to put out an absolute doozy of a statement.  🤨

 

I think it's the former.    Wouldn't be surprised if there is someone here who wants to put out his very unpopular (and absurd) take on this and is using a "new" account to do so instead of using his regular one. 

 

(of course I could be proven wrong by Scot or Rayzor but I'm just throwing that out there)

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The division is most certainly wide open. The Bucs are a problem but Baker Mayfield is and will remain his own worst enemy it's a matter of when not if he has a bad game or even a stretch of bad games. As far as the Panthers they have done an admirable job of trying to address needs as best they can without pulling a Scott Fitterer and getting desperate which has only made us worse off in the past. On the Bryce subject all anyone can really say at this point is we just have to wait and see. This is the year and despite what the Panthers may say publicly doubling down and going all in on WR is as good as any sign anyone should need that they expect Bryce Young to have a very productive and convincing season. The pieces are in place. They aren't perfect but nothing ever will be. Regardless there's honestly no excuse for this staff and this team not to be able to compete in this iteration of the NFC South. Also just want to say this because I can say the hyper defensive posts already being made in here and it's probably going to be a season with highs and lows again but hopefully more highs for sure. But just because there is dialogue about a position group or a player that challenges your preconceived notions or makes you uncomfortable does not make it "hate" or "anti" this player or that player. For some people who talk a lot about nuance you would think this wouldn't need to be stated but that's where we're at. 
    • If I was a coach I would preach "Don't let the refs decide the game" because as soon as you let the NFL the chance to help their bottom dollar whether it be teams that make most money or gambling then they will screw the team that doesn't fit their bottom line......is it rigged? No but do they try and make certain narratives happen abso-freakin-lutley. As I stated in a previous thread NFL players are the ones that SHOULD have all guaranteed contracts but the boot lickers on this forum disagree and argue for the billionaires in this world who own these teams, sheep
    • I wont go quite so far as to say games are rigged.  You wouldnt have to work hard to convince me there was the occasional thumb on the scale but outright rigged? nah.   but collusion on the rest of the "business" of football, sure.  No one really believes that the only time the 32 owners act as one is during the negotiations of the CBA do they?
×
×
  • Create New...