Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Friday Draft Discussion - Rounds 2-3


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

??? Top 3 RB, top 5 WR Corp, former top 3 pick who is like 23 years old at QB. He has weapons and if he’s as good as made out to be, he will make them all legit. 

There's a word for a #3 overall pick who gets jettisoned for relative peanuts after three years to bring in his replacement. That word is "trash".

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

I haven't read this thread since page 34, mildly following the draft on tv so...fill me in on what's happened?

Just the cliff notes, thank you in advance.

We haven't made a pick.

 

 

 

 

That pretty much sums it up 😐

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

I haven't read this thread since page 34, mildly following the draft on tv so...fill me in on what's happened?

Just the cliff notes, thank you in advance.

Everyone who has been pissed about our draft strategy the past 4 years is pissed we’re doing something different… cause logic 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

I haven't read this thread since page 34, mildly following the draft on tv so...fill me in on what's happened?

Just the cliff notes, thank you in advance.

Some think we're geniuses, some think the franchise should liquidate immediately

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

I haven't read this thread since page 34, mildly following the draft on tv so...fill me in on what's happened?

Just the cliff notes, thank you in advance.

Huddle loosing it because of the trade downs, think everyone picked will be clearly better than anyone else we take the rest of the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

There's a word for a #3 overall pick who gets jettisoned for relative peanuts after three years to bring in his replacement. That word is "trash".

Uh huh. Just like tannehill was trash too right 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

He's like Devonta Smith, you just line him up in the slot and constantly have him in motion.

Nah, he's more like that one W.VA receiver from years ago that went number 8 and got stuck on punt return duty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
    • Nah we just talking about giving a platform and normalizing predators (who both beat women) opinions and celebrating it if it fits your narrative.  If that's fun I'm fine being a miserable fug by not supporting P.O.S like that. N b4 you call me a libtard or some other dumb ish know I'm an Anarchist/Libertarian and believe both these dudes should get a complete ass whooping (at min) or something worse for what they have done to women in this world. 
×
×
  • Create New...