Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Madden 22 ranks panthers second worst team in the league


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Darnold IS a dual threat QB. He can run. Is he 85% of what Cam/is/was? No.

Is Fields AND Justin Herbert better than Darnold? Hmph...

They could have kept their franchise QB and still made all these great picks on defense like they have, love that, but they've f'd up the QB position, willingly. Mistake.

Well, my preferred scenario was always to keep Cam, so I'm with you.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just so everyone is aware, these overalls aren't exactly refelective of what the team overall actually is in the game. These are "assigned" overall ratings, that change to reflect the teams actual overall when you start a Franchise.

With that being said, a lot of the Panthers ratings are true head scratchers.

And the Cowboys are always over-rated because the ratings guy is a HUGE Cowboys fan.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/4/2021 at 4:11 PM, micnificent28 said:

This is shocking to me. I mean I get the hype of the jags adding Lawrence and so on but the lions are better than us? Even after losing Stafford?

FB_IMG_1628107728577.jpg

Wow, 73 is terri-bad. Like most teams backup players are higher than a 73...

But honestly, the real question should be who the hell even plays Madden anymore. That game has been dog poo since the mid 2ks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should have been last.
 

Madden world: we are mostly running 4th stringers on top outside of a very select few on the roster. 
 

Real world: we are are running fourth stringers outside of 4 players and everything is put on an untested coach.

 

That's where we are at. I don’t see any reason to rank us differently. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they’re literally a *couple* debatable spots off and that shocks you? And yes, position wise and as a team as a whole, I can see why we’re ranked as such. Teams with worse records have better individual players.

This forum has to take those homer shades off every once in a while. This team is not that great and hasn’t been that great for 6 years. And honestly, as a franchise as a whole. Still in the bottom 3rd.

Instead of demanding Madden get their poo together for a more accurate ranking of the irrelevant poo pile teams at the bottom of the NFL, perhaps being more critical of the Panthers would make more sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Wow, 73 is terri-bad. Like most teams backup players are higher than a 73...

But honestly, the real question should be who the hell even plays Madden anymore. That game has been dog poo since the mid 2ks

A couple years back, they retooled the ratings.  I'm assuming they are still using a similar rating system.  They dialed back the ratings quite a bit, especially during the draft.  A first round pick outside the top 10 is awesome if 72 OVR, especially if they are faster to level up.  Highest player in the draft is probably 80 at best.  Most of the draft is going to be 60's and lower.  Your oline starters will be in the 70's unless you have some above average guys.  Guards with 68 overall starting isn't uncommon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Wow, 73 is terri-bad. Like most teams backup players are higher than a 73...

But honestly, the real question should be who the hell even plays Madden anymore. That game has been dog poo since the mid 2ks

That is inaccurate. Game Is far from perfect, but has been pretty solid more recently. Those who play it at the highest levels anyway. I honestly don't know what people like you want, it's 11 on 11.   Your not going to turn into some different game it's football.

Edited by micnificent28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...