Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers and WR Robby Anderson have agreed to a 2-year, $29.5 million extension, per source.


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SpeedOFLight said:

Happy for Robbie. I’m glad he is in our team and has become one of my favor players. People worry too much about salary stuff for the future. That’s not my job. It’s the GM’s job.

I think the issue is that our past GM's have had a little trouble with this stuff. But I think our NEW FO is doing just fine

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, joemac said:

We will still have plenty of money available next off season to sign a top flight LT if one somehow became available.  Have you seen how much cap space we have projected coming up the next couple of years?  And that is all before the NFL raises the cap dramatically, as is projected.  I know its foreign around here to have a lot of flexibility and cap space, but this is a new regime and they actually seem to understand how to work the salary cap.  

Really? How much do they have that makes them flexible. Especially if a QB is still needed(on top of Darnolds 19M), OL is still a mess, DJax needs signed or replaced, Shaqs contract. And DJ Moore is going to want paid pretty quick after this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

I think the issue is that our past GM's have had a little trouble with this stuff. But I think our NEW FO is doing just fine

Besides 80-100M of wasted money in 2020, they signed two OL(14M guaranteed) no one wanted, and guaranteed Darnold 19M for no reason at all. Wouldn’t call that just fine. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a good deal. The same people saying he didn't want to be here are the ones who have now pivoted to "Now DJ is as good as gone!" and were the same ones complaining about DJ's lack of TDs all during last season and hoping out loud that we didn't extend him for something crazy. LOL.

Side note: If I didn't already know that Harbingers is the failson of a corrupt union executive, I would have sworn he was that cop who Robbie told "I'm gonna fug your wife and nut in her eye." Legend. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've got 25 million in cap space this year, after the Robby signing.  Next year we're projected to have 35 mil in space, before any roll overs of the current balance.  2023 is where things get really fun, as of right now we have 154 million dollars in cap space.  I think we will be OK. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much what I  a few days ago.  Look at the WR group as a whole.

Marshall will be cheap for the next 4.  

Moore, even with an extension, will be relatively cheap for the next 2-3 years. Even is he signs a mega deal it will be somewhat backloaded like they always are. 

WRs 4-5-6 will be cheap vets or rookies on cheap deals.


By the time Moore’s cap hits are large Robbys contract will be over.  Same with Marshall, by the time you have to pay him Robby will be gone.

Overall WR cap hit for the entire team won’t be too bad for the next 2-4 years, but at the same time the team has some stability there.

Also if by the small chance we don’t reach a deal with DJ you have stability of knowing you have Robby for a few more years, especially is Marshall plays good.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Really? How much do they have that makes them flexible. Especially if a QB is still needed(on top of Darnolds 19M), OL is still a mess, DJax needs signed or replaced, Shaqs contract. And DJ Moore is going to want paid pretty quick after this. 

lol at the Shaq comment. His reworked deal allows us to save 12mil cap space if we cut him post 6/1 next year... 

OL isnt a mess... far from it. It's middle of the road and a player away from being solid. Replacing D-Jax wont cost us a dime, bc it will most likely be who is already on the roster or another draft pick. We have almost 40 million in free cap space heading into next year... We are pretty flexible.

 

There is no need to be a Karen.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, joemac said:

We've got 25 million in cap space this year, after the Robby signing.  Next year we're projected to have 35 mil in space, before any roll overs of the current balance.  2023 is where things get really fun, as of right now we have 154 million dollars in cap space.  I think we will be OK. 

So tepper is cheap? That’s what you are saying? 

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is simple if you focus only on OT.  But there is the cap, talent levels that differ from year to year, and team needs that fluctuate, as you know.  While I would be happy with an OT and understand it, I am not sold on OT as the answer. I agree that the game is won or lost in the trenches, but I do not think over-drafting with the first round pick is the only way of addressing it--especially if it may be a year before you know what you have or reap the rewards.  We both agree that you have to stay ahead of it.  Just because you take a T in round 1 does not mean that you have met the need. Teams need qbs too, but drafting them too early in round one is usually disastrous A few weeks ago, I was high on Freeling.  I still am (cautiously), but there are reasons to approach some of these tackles with a "Buyer Beware" approach.  Again, I am not against drafting an OT in round 1, but not if that OT has a late first or second-round grade.  That is not good value.  On top of that, put him in the garage for a year?  Take Freeling, for example.  Some project him to Cleveland at 6.  Really?  He is a fringe first rounder, IMO.  IF you want to give away draft capital to get a non-starter, that is how GMs get fired. First, we can address Freeling’s seemingly massive improvement in pass protection. He did earn an outstanding 86.1 PFF pass-blocking grade in 2025, which ranked seventh among qualified FBS tackles. That was an improvement over his 65.3 mark in 2024. Georgia’s passing game was heavily built on play action and screens, which allowed Freeling to partake in just 95 true pass sets all season. That ranked just barely among the top 200 tackles in the country.   Freeling earned a solid 75.4 PFF pass-blocking grade on those true pass set reps, but that pales in comparison to top tackles in the class, such as Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano. Mauigoa earned his 85.8 true PFF pass-blocking grade, second best in the nation, across 212 such reps, more than twice as many as Freeling.   What about Freeling's run blocking?  61.3--which is slightly above all tackles in the country.  So if you draft Freeling in round 1, you are getting a guy whose numbers were padded by play action and screens--but in pure passing sets and in run blocking, he was average when compared to every tackle in the country. Elite?  Buyer beware. Lomu?  Athletic, Can struggle in the run game and against power rushers.  Late first rounder-early second, imo.  Arms less than 34", which could scare some teams. Proctor?  Can play high and the weight could be a problem he fights.  Personally, I see him as the best option for an immediate starter but his ceiling is lower.   I realize all players have areas of concern, but I think you will see some of these OTs drop on draft day, with good reason.   Fano?  32 inch arms may kick him inside to G. You will respond that all OTs have question marks, and they do--but not researching the situation is not the answer.  Freeling is a stud athlete, and despite the stats, I like him, but not as depth at 19.  Proctor?  I get it if you needed your starter now, and speed rushers give him fits.  To adjust, his angle to block a 9 tech is nearly 90 degrees when it needs to be closer to 45 degrees.  That decreases the pocket, and a short QB can't have that.     
    • Stupid to say golden maye and Lloyd weren't coming just because you said but we're North Carolina? To be fair I don't think anyone would jump ship just to come to Duke either. 
×
×
  • Create New...