Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule names starting MLB


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Seems like way too much of a pain in the ass to keep around if he ends up being the only unvaxxed guy on the roster. Other issue is no one is going to trade for an unvaaxed guy so it's either keep, cut or IR

Omg stepped on his foot, damn this dude is terrible.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jared Patterson said:

I can't figure this one out, but something is up here between Perryman and the Panthers. Maybe, he came in on a cheap deal with the idea of being guaranteed a starting spot to earn a bigger contract down the line and since Carter has earned that he's having sorta a tantrum. IDK, but something is up....

He's dumb and injury prone that's pretty much it.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

I don’t agree but Perryman will be kept for depth watch and see

Possibly, but if you want to send a message, this would be the time.  I am beginning to think that Perryman likes money, does not care that much for football.

Only about $1m of his 2 year, $6m deal is guaranteed.  Just Gave his $$ to Anderson, if I had to guess.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RJK said:

I’m all for keeping perryman for depth. UNLESS a better player is available after cuts. Though I’d argue there are better players available right now in FA 

He only had 48 total tackles last season, I think we can make up that production with someone in FA/waivers

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Seems like way too much of a pain in the ass to keep around if he ends up being the only unvaxxed guy on the roster. Other issue is no one is going to trade for an unvaaxed guy so it's either keep, cut or IR

He couldn't practice because someone stepped on his foot?GIF by South Park

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • i am anxious to see what he does with this new situation. i think the schedule is about as favorable as you could hope for the first half of the year. i don't expect a dramatic and quick  improvement, but i do expect improvement.
    • truthfully, when did he have time last year to throw it down field? plays took far too long to develop and the OL gave him no time.  i think we are basing far too much of bryce's assessment on a situation that didn't work out in his favor at all. it was probably the worst situation a rookie QB could have found himself in. the only i can think of who had it worse was David Carr, who had an even worse rookie season than Bryce by a significant margin statistically.  i think most would realize that carr was probably a better QB than his record would show, but he was shell shocked in his first few years because they did nothing to try to help him out. 3 of his 5 years in houston he led the league in sacks. i don't think he would ever have been an elite QB, but had he been in a better situation he probably would have had a better and longer career. point is, i don't think we saw everything that bryce is capable of because he was limited by the situation. but i understand the pessimism most have, because all we really have to go on was what we saw last year. that's why i wait to see what happens with a better situation. i just don't think you can give an accurate assessment of him based on last year. it wouldn't be fair for any rookie, tbh, but for one whos situation was so fugged up i think it's even more unfair. had nothing changed in the situation, you could probably expect more of the same. that's just not the case, though. a whole lot changed for the team and for his situation and i think for the better. it just makes sense that if we improved the situation that he will improve. 
×
×
  • Create New...