Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sean Ryan on key Darnold improvement (P-Wire's Rizzuti) & my $0.02


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Yeah, he never become the the best he could have been. 

He had the talent to be the best to ever play the game. 

Prior to last year, Josh Allen looked like a bust, but he made a significant jump and was an MVP candidate.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

Some qbs definitely improve at the pro level. 

 yeah, I have never argued that they don't.

I'm arguing you don't change their DNA.   You aren't going to be able to coach ice water into David Carr's veins while in the pocket.   You got it or you don't.  You aren't going to be able to coach that crazy ball out of Favre.    You aren't going to coach Cam into playing it safe with his body when he thinks the team really needs the play.  

and if someone is a poor decision maker, hesitant, etc.....you aren't going to change that IMO 4 years into a NFL career.  It's been there too long. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

Part of the reason I never fell in love with Newton (pre or post Draft) was because his mechanics sucked.

He got by on sheer talent. He improved as a player, but he never made that quantum leap that Rodgers expected him to (after he played against us when Newton was a rookie, Rodgers said he was glad that the Packers were playing us now rather than when Newton made the leap).

It seems like Darnold is more coachable so far, but I agree the test will be when the pocket starts collapsing during the season.

imagine watching five years of cam's progression from struggling as a rookie with a great offensive line and steve smith as a wideout to carrying the team to a super bowl with a poo line and ted fuging ginn and suggesting cam wasn't coachable or didn't make a quantum leap lmao

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm excited to see Sam play for the Panthers. As an SC (Trojans) fan, I watched his entire college career and we had some really great and exciting games under the bright lights, such as the Rose Bowl game against Penn St. When I lived in the Carolinas from 2015-2019, I was always wondering how Sam would look with the Panthers. When Carolina traded for him, I was pumped to say the least. Granted, his NFL start with the Jets was not going well, I have faith that he can be great with an organization like the Panthers. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's "coach speak", why make this thread and post the article at all then?  🤷‍♂️

 

I mean...what Sean said wasn't wrong at all.   Footwork is essential to be able to throw accurate passes and what-not.

IMO, it just seems as if some people here just don't want Sam to be successful because they wanted Justin Fields and are throwing a tantrum like little kids.

Edited by glenwo2
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

 yeah, I have never argued that they don't.

I'm arguing you don't change their DNA.   You aren't going to be able to coach ice water into David Carr's veins while in the pocket.   You got it or you don't.  You aren't going to be able to coach that crazy ball out of Favre.    You aren't going to coach Cam into playing it safe with his body when he thinks the team really needs the play.  

and if someone is a poor decision maker, hesitant, etc.....you aren't going to change that IMO 4 years into a NFL career.  It's been there too long. 

 

Maybe not but I wouldnt say its impossible.   I feel like decision making is a trait that's a lot different than the others you mentioned.   I feel like decision making can be helped by scheme and even just the way the quarterback makes their roads.  Starting by simplifying the decisions you're asking the qb to make and building from there.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PhillyB said:

imagine watching five years of cam's progression from struggling as a rookie with a great offensive line and steve smith as a wideout to carrying the team to a super bowl with a poo line and ted fuging ginn and suggesting cam wasn't coachable or didn't make a quantum leap lmao

I am not going to disagree that Cam carried that team on his back, but it was still the same Cam as the previous seasons. 

Cam always relied on his extraordinary athleticism and never really changed his mechanics as a QB.  With all the pounding and abuse he took under Ron and Co. he was never going to do that forever and as we saw when the injuries started piling up Cam wasn't able to carry the team or any team with his freak athleticism any longer.  He never "grew" into a prototypical NFL quarterback and his mechanics never fundamentally changed.....there was always reversion back to his natural instincts.  This can be blamed on two things in my opinion:  1.) Cam was who he was and there was no way to really change what was ingrained in him over 20+ years and 2.) to be able to make that sort of change as a QB you have to have protection and time to gain confidence that the change being asked for is possible...he never had that!  Personally I think it was a combo of the two.

Are we going to see the same with Darnold?  I think the answer lies in if we ever give him the protection and peace of mind that Cam never had.  I think there's a better chance of a change with Darnold, but without a solid O-line he'll revert to running around slinging it trying to make plays. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...