Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This is the Turning Point Game of the 2021 Season


Hoenheim
 Share

Do We Win this Pivotal Game?   

132 members have voted

  1. 1. Are the Panthers going to Beat the Cowboys on Sunday?

    • Yes we're blowing them out Ala Saints 2021
      24
    • Yes but a close defensive struggle
      50
    • No we will narrowly lose
      28
    • Lose but Moral victory
      5
    • Bad meltdown Ala 2018/2019
      5
    • Dadnold will outduel dak and we win in a legendary shoot out
      20


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, ericr0319 said:

a loss on the road game isn't bad for anything other than the media will doubt us. but who care. we will still be favored in our next 2 games and should win them. I would be happy if we end up 5-1.

If we win, it will shake things up.  The media will go nuts, we'll be ranked top 10 (we are top 12ish now) and it will be a 2nd statement game, because this time we are missing key pieces on the road.

The excuses will be that we had longer to prep bs.

Huge opportunity, big hill to climb tho.

We can win this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Harbingers said:

Ummm I’m gonna go with a no on this. Even on the timelines they are. 22 has methodically been basically half of our offensive production and the only factor in the run game, which in turn has allowed the passing game to open up. Want to see what a season without CMC looks like on offense. Check last season. 

Last season, we had a chicken at QB, and less weapons on offense. Darnold is more gifted and more willing to learn and improve. He also has more legit targets all around. Moreover, Chuba settled down after a few carries, and sometimes that's what it takes to bring out an RB's best: touches!

CMC's replacement will be handled by a decidedly capable committee. I don't know if we can say the same for Horn, and that makes me uneasy going against Dakota, Lamb and Cooper. We'll find out what's what in short order.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think last nights game is a true reflection of the Cowboys.

The Eagles play calling on both sides of the ball was dogshit, their RBs had a total of 3 carries. 

The only team that has really tried to run on them(Chargers) has had success.

I think we will run the ball well, get Sam comfortable with quick throws and beat them with play action. 

On defense, if the Panthers can continue to stop the run, we should be fine. Dak will make some throws and Dallas will probably score between 17-24, but I think the Panthers will put up closer to 30.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Last season, we had a chicken at QB, and less weapons on offense. Darnold is more gifted and more willing to learn and improve. He also has more legit targets all around. Moreover, Chuba settled down after a few carries, and sometimes that's what it takes to bring out an RB's best: touches!

CMC's replacement will be handled by a decidedly capable committee. I don't know if we can say the same for Horn, and that makes me uneasy going against Dakota, Lamb and Cooper. We'll find out what's what in short order.

 

We have enough corners to somewhat replace a 3 game rookie who was doing real good but hadn’t faced any major challenges through 2.5 games. It’s not like Horn had faced Thomas or Evans, he essential was covering second and third string WR’s for his time played so far. This is not a knock on him just a fact. Bouye can go outside if needed and we just brought in another first rounder to replace him for the time being. 
 

On offense you are talking about nearly half our offensive production and a staunch pass blocker with the experience needed at that position. Chubba just isn’t up to par on that yet.
 

Now, instead of having to put a spy on CMC every play he’s in and game plan around that threat defensive coordinator can do a general game plan that will be much more getting to and frustrating Darnold. Offenses weren’t gameplanning around Horn and if CJ is as good as the coaches think and most people on here say he is that’s a non-issue. They are much more concerned about our pass rush getting there in 2.5 seconds, which they often do. 
 

Not to mention if, knock on wood, something was to happen to Chubba we’d have basically two third stringers to try and get any rushing yardage generated. Neither guy I’d love to have blocking 1st string DE/DL that will inevitably be slipping through the sieve that is our OL. Which means even with Chubba we are going to have to run a lot more shotgun or short play and keep Ian in the backfield instead of him being able to line up next to a tackle to help chip blocks and get out into the flat. Suddenly our already bad line is even worse. 
 

CMC is easily the worse loss in general. Anyone who says else wise is kidding themselves. The argument can be that Horn is worse due to the length of injury, especially missing that critical developmental time as a rookie and not being able to face some of the premiere receivers in the league that the NFCS is loaded with. Not to mention a 3 bone foot break is gonna slow him down and mess with his confidence when he returns, might not take breaks and switches as fast either cause he’s worried it’ll happen all over again. But overall as players on face value to the team as a whole right now CMC is by far the bigger loss. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I listened to Greg Olsen's WFNZ segment a little while ago.  He kept emphasizing his concern at how young (and raw) our team is. Sounded a bit like he thinks this game in Jerryworld will be a bit big for them. Likened it a bit to a playoff game with the hype and Dallas's star power on offense.

I get his point and I respect it. Obviously this team IS super young..

But...! It made me very glad we're coming off the pressure of an away primetime game in which there was significant adversity. (Big injuries, BS penalties). I think the way the team played in 2nd half vs Houston shows me that Dallas may not be too big for them. I think they'll have some of the "BIG GAME" jitters out of their system. At least I hope so!!

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s big in the sense that’s it the next team in our way - against a conference opponent who happens to also be a common opponent of our division.  Winning would be huge - but not season defining.  
 

I do believe, however, that if we win this one, we carry a tremendous amount of momentum back to Charlotte the next week and begin the season 5-0, which would be huge . 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

I listened to Greg Olsen's WFNZ segment a little while ago.  He kept emphasizing his concern at how young (and raw) our team is. Sounded a bit like he thinks this game in Jerryworld will be a bit big for them. Likened it a bit to a playoff game with the hype and Dallas's star power on offense.

I get his point and I respect it. Obviously this team IS super young..

But...! It made me very glad we're coming off the pressure of an away primetime game in which there was significant adversity. (Big injuries, BS penalties). I think the way the team played in 2nd half vs Houston shows me that Dallas may not be too big for them. I think they'll have some of the "BIG GAME" jitters out of their system. At least I hope so!!

It’s a fair point. There is almost no big game in the spotlight with high expectations experience on our team even among the vets. Hell, even looking at their college careers there isn’t too much of that.

Although, I think they might just be too young, naive and cocky to even realize they’re supposed to be nervous.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The injuries suck but they will be without some key talent as well. That Oline is taking a loss without Collins and that is not someone you want to lose facing our team.

We also have a long week to prepare and they will be on a shortened week having played Monday. That gives us quite a lot of extra time to rest, recover and game plan for them.

Ultimately I could see this going either way, but I am certainly not going into this "scared" by any means. The extra time is a big advantage for getting the next man up acclimated and ready. I know I have oddly built a reputation for being a dumb homer here simply for supporting the Darnold trade (which how is that working out so far?) but I think we win this one. Mainly for our long week to their short week advantage. That's a pretty big deal. 

Either way it falls, I expect this game to be close. But this is definitely one we can win and I think the extra time gives us the advantage, even with having to travel to Dallas. We'll find out soon. 

Edited by TheMostInterestingMan
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

The injuries suck but they will be without some key talent as well. That Oline is taking a loss without Collins and that is not someone you want to lose facing our team.

We also have a long week to prepare and they will be on a shortened week having played Monday. That gives us quite a lot of extra time to rest, recover and game plan for them.

Ultimately I could see this going either way, but I am certainly not going into this "scared" by any means. The extra time is a big advantage for getting the next man up acclimated and ready. I know I have oddly built a reputation for being a dumb homer here simply for supporting the Darnold trade (which how is that working out so far?) but I think we win this one. Mainly for our long week to their short week advantage. That's a pretty big deal. 

Either way it falls, I expect this game to be close. But this is definitely one we can win and I think the extra time gives us the advantage, even with having to travel to Dallas. We'll find out soon. 

The extra rest and preparation time is a big advantage to us, as you said.  And there's maybe another thing -- they just played a (to them) big game against a division opponent, and dominated.  It's possible that there's a letdown in facing (what they undoubtedly believe to be) an underdog upstart team like the Panthers.

So hunger on our part may play a role in beating overconfidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...