Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott or Moton playing LT this week?


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

If Brady does well with this opportunity….

LT : Christiansen

LG: Erving

C : Elf when he returns

RG: Daley

RT: Moton

Just think how huge it would be for our franchise if Brady shows well at LT as a rookie. Fixing the interior in the off-season would be very attainable and we could still afford to resign our difference makers. 

Edited by ECHornet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Scott12345 said:

You guys have way too high expectations for BC & Brown

granted what we have is awful….but the rookies could actually be worse 

This is probably pretty accurate.  A rookie LT is a target.  Brady is a good athlete, and we would have that, but he stands to get bull rushed.  I like him at LG---but I am curious to see how he'd do at LT.  Shorter arms tend to be problematic, but a T with good feet can overcome that to some degree. I want to see him try it, but if so, expect some bull rushing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, MHS831 said:

This is probably pretty accurate.  A rookie LT is a target.  Brady is a good athlete, and we would have that, but he stands to get bull rushed.  I like him at LG---but I am curious to see how he'd do at LT.  Shorter arms tend to be problematic, but a T with good feet can overcome that to some degree. I want to see him try it, but if so, expect some bull rushing.

image.jpeg.0b09d90fd2561ff689458c69beabd3ce.jpeg

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was wondering and can’t remember- did Moton start his rookie year? 
IIRC he did not start and also did not play a lot either. And he was 2nd round pick. 
BC is a 3rd rounder - I would not get too excited about him…yet. Let’s hope he is a part of the solution in the future. Brown- he is big and strong but was a 6th rounder for a reason. Let’s hope he can be a part of the solution in the future as well. But for now- I think the oline “is what it is”…which is not very good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, thennek said:

Was wondering and can’t remember- did Moton start his rookie year? 
IIRC he did not start and also did not play a lot either. And he was 2nd round pick. 
BC is a 3rd rounder - I would not get too excited about him…yet. Let’s hope he is a part of the solution in the future. Brown- he is big and strong but was a 6th rounder for a reason. Let’s hope he can be a part of the solution in the future as well. But for now- I think the oline “is what it is”…which is not very good. 

Do not think so.  I saw him on goal line situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...