Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers are 3-2


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

And the Panthers have a lot of issues that have been further exposed.

Seems this team hasn't learned fron last week and whatever the poo happened today is concerning.

The offensive line sucks, yes, but Sam Darnold looks like he's regressed. Questionable decision making that came up last week after the second half. Joe Brady also with a few boneheaded calls.

We got turnovers and didn't capitalize. The Eagles kept begging us to win but we threw a bigger poo-burger.

Defense gassed all day because of it.

If this team is playoff caliber, a lot of things need to be addressed. Discipline, better playcalling, offensive line, and Sam Darnold needs to be better too. 

Not the game I wanted to see after last week, and worrying if this continues to be a trend.

 

We always get to middle of October and tank bc whatever coaching staff is here is inept and can't adapt. This was the rebound game and it looked like rivera out there. How long is this rebuild supposed to take? Stop trading our draft oicks away for cornerbacks

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I don't see a rousing look for the silver linings speech for this one sorry man. We mustered a measly 18 points at home against an Eagles team that surrendered 83 points in two games. The defense is good but the offense played like one of the worst in the league today and I doubt that's going to change much this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, we have a championship caliber defense already, that is pretty insane for Rhule to turnaround after having the leagues worst defense two years ago. 
 

I expect them to be aggressive next offseason in getting Watson or an actual franchise QB and then the wins will come. Unfortunately Stafford turned us down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If david tepper was watching today. You know he aint happy. I dont think he was ever sold on Darnold and is just seeing how things will play out. This is a weird predicament because i dont think you can put a rookie qb on with a Roster this talented.  Not gonna say that guys name....so imma just hope Darnold turns it around so those rumors dont circulate anymore. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saca312 said:

And the Panthers have a lot of issues that have been further exposed.

Seems this team hasn't learned fron last week and whatever the poo happened today is concerning.

The offensive line sucks, yes, but Sam Darnold looks like he's regressed. Questionable decision making that came up last week after the second half. Joe Brady also with a few boneheaded calls.

We got turnovers and didn't capitalize. The Eagles kept begging us to win but we threw a bigger poo-burger.

Defense gassed all day because of it.

If this team is playoff caliber, a lot of things need to be addressed. Discipline, better playcalling, offensive line, and Sam Darnold needs to be better too. 

Not the game I wanted to see after last week, and worrying if this continues to be a trend.

 

Hold On To Your Butts GIF by Indiana Jones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...