Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

D. Brown


cardiackat88.
 Share

Recommended Posts

For fugs sake get this man on the field.

If you really worried that much about his weight then tie a big mac to a string and dangle it in front of his face and make him do gassers.

Wtf ever it takes, get that man out on the field.

Maybe we can even do addition by subtraction by benching the the entire interior line and just having Brown play center and both guards at the same time. Can't hurt can it?

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously, i'm so sick of Daley and Miller. One is a journeyman who has clearly regressed from last season. He is a decent depth option, but nothing more. Certainly not an every week starter. r. The other is just another 6th round pick(like Brown, though Brown should have gone higher), has trouble staying healthy, and gets blown away by D lineman like he's a leaf and the D lineman is the leaf blower. 

Edited by BlackPanther21_
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RJK said:

He at least 100% should be subbed in on short yardage situations. He’s prob the 2nd best run blocker on the team behind Erving and def the best among the guards 

Brown should be at Fb leading the way for our RB in the goal line like how Cowgirls do with McGovern. But, we don’t have any coaches with a creative mind. 

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last season, we had to play a bunch of newbs, so I think we may have gotten it wrong about Rhule. He's seriously giving me some Rivera vibes, meaning he's going to play underperforming vets until he's absolutely forced not to, either via injury or the vet fugs up so much that even Stevie Wonder can see the need for a change.

Maybe once November arrives...

Edited by top dawg
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never seen anyone effectively bull rush Deonte Brown, and that includes Derrick Brown. No one is going to push Deonte into Sam. No one.

I think Rhule has his finger in the pot of everything going on with this team, and that makes sense given his salary. We know that Rhule demands athleticism from all of his players, and Deonte sometimes moves like a tranquilized Rhino when asked to to get up field and haul ass. Rhule wants players hustling beyond just what their standard responsibilities involve.

I think Rhule wanted Deonte as a long shot who he MIGHT be able to slim down beyond the weight he's already lost. Rhule acknowledged that he may be one of those guys who can't lose much more weight than what he has already lost. Deonte might not be up to speed on the assignments on all these exotic fronts and stunts that we might face from week to week. Even so I bet he's wanting to play especially now that they have let Christensen out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...