Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Charlotte ever have a parade?


slumdogmillionaire
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, CammyCamLoveDaKidz said:

Hank Aaron dies and his team wins the World Series. Braves had 99 wins this season, first World Series appearance since '99 ..

First World Series win in 26 years - the year MLB expanded roster size from 25 to 26 players - World Series started on the 26th

This stuff isn't a coincidence .. sports are scripted, obviously

Deleted because this buffoon is not worth my time in responding.

Edited by travisura
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/5/2021 at 1:11 PM, BurnNChinn said:

I guess ur not an hockey fan so sad for u!

Just like your sport man. It doesn’t matter that nobody else does. You don’t see this kind of thing from fans of other lower tier sports. I’ve never heard a fan of competitive eating or lawn mower racing acting so insecure and they’re a lot more tolerable because of it. Take notes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/5/2021 at 12:55 PM, slumdogmillionaire said:

Go Braves!!!   Panthers should have had it at least twice now but I won’t get into too much into that.   If Cam had an offensive line and organization that protected him we would have gotten at least one after that 2015 Super Bowl as well.

I do think we will get a parade but it might be Lamelo Ball and Miles Bridges who deliver it first.  If we had a young QB we drafted I may think Panthers within 3 years but we may be on a QB carousel.

I’ll say most likely parades will come from

Hornets 

Tampa Bay Rays moving to charlotte

then panthers 

I was at the Braves parade. It was great. Took my daughter to see. They are my first love when it comes to sports 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...