Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bleacher Report: Guess who's NOT on this list?


PanthersATL
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Only person I would consider firing after this season is our OC. You can maybe say Rhule seat would be heating up entering next season. But nobody is expecting the guy to be fired this off-season. 

Nah, dead man walking. This season hasn't gotten anywhere near as embarrassing as it will get.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

As much as most of the huddle want to see Brady gone. The oline issues alone make me want to give him another year.  

Who would be his replacement? Would we change schemes? Would we promote within to keep continuity?

 

Disagree.  Brady is a problem.  We've repeated the same process again.

Last year, TB5 looked good for the first few games, then fell off the planet.  This year, Darnold looked good the first few games, then fell off the planet.

It's almost like as soon as teams get tape on our offense, we get found out.

Likewise our red zone offense.  Last year, ranked 28th at 50%.  This year, ranked 29th at 51%.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Disagree.  Brady is a problem.  We've repeated the same process again.

Last year, TB5 looked good for the first few games, then fell off the planet.  This year, Darnold looked good the first few games, then fell off the planet.

It's almost like as soon as teams get tape on our offense, we get found out.

Likewise our red zone offense.  Last year, ranked 28th at 50%.  This year, ranked 29th at 51%.

Sam Darnold is our quarterback.

I repeat- Sam Darnold is our quarterback 

Fire Brady idc but there is a reason we suck and it falls on the shoulders of the OL and QB groups we went into the season with (thanks Rhule)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...