Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

LOL…Bridgewater.


Tbe
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Really don’t try to make a tackle with the game on the line. Wow 

Let’s be real… if I was a Denver fan I’d be upset. On the contrary, if I was a Denver fan and let’s say Josh Allen was the QB and the same play occurred I wouldn’t care.

It’s a double-standard and it exists.

I will say that over half the Broncos roster had a chance to make the tackle and they all failed… it’s easy to pick out Bridgewater but it really shouldn’t have gotten to that point.

Like the papers read… business decision.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

I mean, Teddy could have made an attempt, and while he could have slowed Slay down, he wasn’t going to be able to tackle him.

 

Im not as hard on QBs when it comes to stuff like this. Cam ruined his shoulder making a tackle, that looking back, I wish he would’ve just let him go.

I don't even blame him for protecting his body. It's his generally uncompetitive nature that kills me. The guy visibily does not care very much about his teams and if I can see it on TV I can't imagine how his teammates must feel.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

I don't even blame him for protecting his body. It's his generally uncompetitive nature that kills me. The guy visibily does not care very much about his teams and if I can see it on TV I can't imagine how his teammates must feel.

Yea, he does look like he just doesn’t give a damn on that play. You’re right, in that his teammates probably feel/felt a certain way. To make matters worse, it also looks like he tripped up a fellow teammate. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I concur with others about risk of injury after what happened to Cam. But everyone in that locker room with Ted might not feel the same way when they go over the tape from that game and that's part of being the leader on offense. That's the job.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Seltzer said:

It's easy to cherry pick any one play to pile on someone.

It wasn't a great effort by Teddy but there is definitely a double standard with QBs.

Brady wouldn't even attempt to stop someone to risk getting hurt.

I was glad we got rid of Teddy, but I will never question his toughness. Anyone who does should read what happened to him on the Vikings practice field (he absolutely could have died or been permanently disabled) on one of the most freak sports injuries ever.

To be able to come back from that and play with guys coming at you every play... only a couch warrior would discount that

People were questioning Teddy's desire to win while here, but I definitely remember a 4th down conversion run where Teddy absolutely put his body in jeopardy to fight for the yardage.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Seltzer said:

It's easy to cherry pick any one play to pile on someone.

It wasn't a great effort by Teddy but there is definitely a double standard with QBs.

Brady wouldn't even attempt to stop someone to risk getting hurt.

I was glad we got rid of Teddy, but I will never question his toughness. Anyone who does should read what happened to him on the Vikings practice field (he absolutely could have died or been permanently disabled) on one of the most freak sports injuries ever.

To be able to come back from that and play with guys coming at you every play... only a couch warrior would discount that

New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady dives and misses tackling  Atlanta Falcons cornerback Robert Alford who returns an interception  82-yards for a touchdown during the second quarter at Super Bowl LI at

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...