Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Meet new OC Jeff Nixon (puke)


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I agree completely, and no I don't trust Rhule.

I just distrust him equally regardless of who from our current staff fills in as interim OC.  

There are...were five coaches on staff who had no direct or indirect connection to Matt Rhule. Brady was the highest ranking of them.

The others are Meyer (OL) Angelichio (TEs) Blackburn (ST) and Don Johnson (Pass Rush Specialist, the only defensive coach).

Johnson probably survives. I seriously doubt Meyer does. Blackburn is probably about 50-50, maybe less given that he's got a Baylor guy in line behind him. Angelichio has Gilbride waiting in the wings too so... 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CmC2k said:

Let's not forget that even if brady was good and got a HC job somewhere Rhule would've just promoted Nixon. 

I think Nixon would have been the OC if Tepper didn't want Brady..

Imo Brady was a Tepper hire not a Rhule hire. 

Nixon is Like Snow to Rhule..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Felt like the MAJORITY of the board was not a Brady fan, team makes a move to move on and now you scoff at the replacement as though we can just go out on the street and hire an OC that runs an offense NO ONE in the building knows. 

Ya'll funny, hard enough having Cam learn on the fly, but we supposed to install a new offense in Week 13, the lack of common sense here is overwhelming at times. 

If there's to be a change it will be this off-season, IMO we need a proven play-caller if Rhule is retained, and if anything promote Nixon to Assistance OC if the plan is to groom him, I doubt he proves himself as the interim OC, and it also sounds like it's ''group effort'' among the offensive staff to some degree. 

Either way, this my team so I'll be dialed in. 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...