Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cardinals vs Rams last night vs Panthers


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

The game last night between the Cardinals and Rams was a tremendously enjoyable game 

Two quality  NFL teams and two young HC coaches who also called offensive plays 

there hasn’t been a Panthers  game in years that looked like that 

I asked myself if a Rhule team could ever look like that and the answer is ‘no’  

yes, I know both of those coaches made mistakes in their early tenure, but they got better, not worse 

if Tepper does not show  Matt Rhule the door come Jan 10, then that tells me the problem is the owner  

The owner won’t change.  

it’s his club and he can do what he wantS

it may well be ‘lipstick on a pig’ with Rhule but it’s Tepper’s pig. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cards weren’t afraid to can their first round QB after a year or so and it’s been tremendous for their team. Kliff has gotten away from the cutesy calls and running more NFL schemes to the success of Kyler.

 

One thing to remember is that Kliff and Rhule met a couple times in the Big 12 and that’s why I think we’re 2-0 vs. the Cards with Rhule. He’s just a better college coach and deserves to do well in the NCAA where he can recruit and do things that appeal to 18 year olds rather than grown men with families. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthera onca said:

Both of those coaches went out and got the QB that they wanted. Murray looks like the real deal, and McVay decided Goff was garbage and shipped him off to the football wasteland known as Detroit, and managed to get Stafford in the process. A great QB is everything.

Most of this fan base would have a fit if they spent a #1 pick on a QB a year after spending a top 10 pick on a QB.  They would start whining some gibberish about needing to protect him or give him weapons.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious why Pittsburgh let the Conner go? He looked like a legit player and can catch out of the back field. Between him, Kirk and Hopkins at WR, what more does Arizona need? 

Granted, the end of the game was horrible- everything about Arizona's clock management when they recovered the on-side kick was brutally inept.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, KillaCamNewton said:

It’s a QB driven league 

draft your guy, pair him with a QB guru, have a former head coach run your defense

amazing how arguably the most unsuccessful franchise in sports figured that out but we couldnt

Also, Arizona didn't waste precious time with a incompetent head coach, they fired him after one year.

Tepper needs to take note.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

I'm curious why Pittsburgh let the Conner go? He looked like a legit player and can catch out of the back field. Between him, Kirk and Hopkins at WR, what more does Arizona need? 

Granted, the end of the game was horrible- everything about Arizona's clock management when they recovered the on-side kick was brutally inept.

I was surprised as well. Connor is legit. He stepped up well for Pittsburgh when Bell was the starter and went down. Now he is flourishing with Arizona. To think he was a FA back that we could have picked up!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AU-panther said:

Most of this fan base would have a fit if they spent a #1 pick on a QB a year after spending a top 10 pick on a QB.  They would start whining some gibberish about needing to protect him or give him weapons.

 

Hell some people are wanting to roll with Darnold next year because our line is terrible. You have to have a QB to compete. If there is one we like we need to try to obtain him. Best case scenario is new coach and new QB next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:

The game last night between the Cardinals and Rams was a tremendously enjoyable game 

Two quality  NFL teams and two young HC coaches who also called offensive plays 

there hasn’t been a Panthers  game in years that looked like that 

I asked myself if a Rhule team could ever look like that and the answer is ‘no’  

yes, I know both of those coaches made mistakes in their early tenure, but they got better, not worse 

if Tepper does not show  Matt Rhule the door come Jan 10, then that tells me the problem is the owner  

The owner won’t change.  

it’s his club and he can do what he wantS

it may well be ‘lipstick on a pig’ with Rhule but it’s Tepper’s pig. 

 

Yeah I was thinking the same thing as I was watching the Bills and Bucs play on Sunday.  We aren't even close to being in the same league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...