Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Here’s closer look of “Cam’s fumble”


GoobyPls
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

its the momentum and angle of the ball that throws off Hubbard. Cam is falling in to him and ball is coming from a downward  position with an upward angle. I love Cam to death, but he should have just went down. 9 out of 10 QBs tuck that ball and live for the next play.

Classic trying to do too much to save a struggling team.

Cam has a long history of saving the Panthers so it is hard to blame him for trying, but this team is beyond saving.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, demcj said:

cam made a terrific effort to not take the L on this play, but rarely does anything good happen when trying to make something out of nothing on a botched snapped. the best option is always to just fall on the ball, and kill the down.   

I mean he put the ball into the RB’s chest, in only a way someone the size of cam could. He’s the least at fault on this play. Had that been CMC he would have had the awareness to know what was going on. I agree with Ricky despite that huge hole Hubbard was not the main play there and thus was not expecting the handoff. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Is that Deonte Brown's lone snap? Immediately getting to the second level looking more athletic than Miller or Daley have all season?

That’s what got my attention. Noticed his athleticism in preseason too. Not sure why he hasn’t been given more of a chance given the lack of talent on the OL.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GoobyPls said:

He put in Chuba chest, how did Rhule fault Cam for this?

 

 

 

 

My dude, you know that “blame Cam” is the fugging default setting for half or more of this forum.

Why are you surprised the idiot chubster who fills the role of Head Coach on this team would be any different?

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PantherGuy said:

Matt Rhule has really gotten on my nerves the past few weeks because he tends to put blame on people who don't deserve it for any given mishap or problem. Awhile ago he blamed the defense for losing games when the offense couldn't do poo with Darnold at QB, leaving the defense on the field the majority of the game and sometimes in very short fields. Now he blames Cam for this fumble and can't make up his mind about his QB. How these guys are still willing to give a rat's ass about playing for him is beyond me.

Really just publicly calling out anyone is not ok. Critique in private and praise in public. Even if your player is doing stupid poo it’s still YOUR player. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Donald LaFell said:

Really just publicly calling out anyone is not ok. Critique in private and praise in public. Even if your player is doing stupid poo it’s still YOUR player. 

Remember good ol’ MoRon’s “I would have taken the shot too!”

This organization has always been sooooooooo respectful and appreciative of Cam Newton.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I’ve been saying, just lazy as hell to blame cam for some of this teams blunders, it’s why Rhule needs to go, guy just got here and we want to blame him for this mess that we’re surrounded with since the start.

it’s the same as when he left, if he doesn’t play perfect criticism is blown out of proportion, he’s got his things he can improve on but man we are expecting cam to carry a team that is floundering in all phases of football except our fg unit. I hope tepper is smart enough to see through the scapegoating Rhule is pulling lately 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...