Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hasson Reddick… what are you going to offer him?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Pay the man. He is produces and is a great piece to build around.

There are guys under contract we can ditch to create cap space. Erving, Elf, Darnold and Anderson would be easy targets. We have 2 June 1st designations we can use and creative cap contracts.

Keep Reddick...if he wants to come back here at all thst is.

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You assume he wants to stay here. Maybe doesn't want to stick it out with this sh%t show. If he is looking to play on a contender now and not fug around with this mess anymore....this probably isn't the best choice.

 

Edited by Jmac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

I'd still let him go since I wouldn't pay big money to a smaller guy that can just rush the passer.

Agree, 10.5 sacks but can't stop the run. No thanks. We need to get back to ygm sized guys.  Reddick is too small to stop the run and not fast enough to be a coverage lb. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, toldozer said:

Agree, 10.5 sacks but can't stop the run. No thanks. We need to get back to ygm sized guys.  Reddick is too small to stop the run and not fast enough to be a coverage lb. 

If this is the new argument then we need to just switch gears and put all our resources in the offense bc even with a whole draft and back to back first round picks the defense is still a mess. Also kick the tires on potential trades no one should be off limits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...