Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

That play on 4th and 1 that Rhule "wanted" instead? Yeah, that wouldn't have worked, and Cam made the right decision the play called for.

Saca312

By Saca312,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)

It is becoming a clear and obvious trend that if a player isn't Rhule's guy, he'll throw them under the bus.

That 4th and 1 comment he had was hilarious, because that run play Cam "should've" done was, well, not gonna work either:

RB would've been stuffed plenty before if Cam stuck by Rhule's script.

And no, 24 was not blocked. And heck by Rhule's words because 24 wasn't blocked Cam made the CORRECT call for this play. 

Rhule just assumed 24 was blocked, which very much is NOT the case.

Get this pathetic head coach off my team and let him rot some D3 college program instead.

Edited by Saca312
  • Pie 9
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BIGH2001 Grand Master

BIGH2001

Posted
Posted

The execution failure on that play was the other receiver on the outside (think it was Zylstra) totally missing his block on the corner thus leaving a free shot on Robby. That play was predictable and probably doomed from the start. It should have been a punt anyway.  fug you rhule.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrianS Veteran

BrianS

Posted
Posted

I do not like a coach who throws his players under the bus like that.  Especially before he has a chance to go watch the film.  Seems pretty obvious watching the film that there wasn't a run play that was going to happen.  It's like the Bills knew we had one of the most dynamic running QB's in history back there and took steps to stop it.  Weird.

On the outside, the play design was off.  Someone said earlier that the outside receiver missed his block.  True.  However, he wasn't going to make it anyway because of the design.  He was grossly out-leveraged by the CB there.  The play design was asking him to make a tremendous reach block and that's a really tough ask for a receiver in space like that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Saca312 said:

It is becoming a clear and obvious trend that if a player isn't Rhule's guy, he'll throw them under the bus.

That 4th and 1 comment he had was hilarious, because that run play Cam "should've" done was, well, not gonna work either:

RB would've been stuffed plenty before if Cam stuck by Rhule's script.

And no, 24 was not blocked. And heck by Rhule's words because 24 wasn't blocked Cam made the CORRECT call for this play. 

Rhule just assumed 24 was blocked, which very much is NOT the case.

Get this pathetic head coach off my team and let him rot some D3 college program instead.

Wtf was Ian Thomas doing too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Everything about that play was poo including Cams throw btw. Stop trying to salvage poo from a dung heap everyone is embarrassing themselves. The fact that no matter what the play wasn't going to work is just hilarious icing.

There's been a load of talk about that play, but I haven't really taken part in much of it because I just see it as less of an issue in and of itself and more a symptom of the larger disease.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      OTA's

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

    • Jackie Lee
      OTA's

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

    • electro's horse
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By electro's horse · Posted

      I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...