Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule on why Darnolds option was picked up

philw5289

By philw5289,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CanadianCat Veteran

CanadianCat

Posted
Posted

Its sad when the direct comparable of what Carolina should have been is what the Saints are currently. 

 

I was always giddy with excitement as to how the Saints would become a complete disaster when they cap finally caught up to them. Instead, they ride through the season with terrible QB's but stay competitive to the final game. Now they are a QB away from dominating again. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Uh yea…the better question is why did we give up draft picks for what we saw on the field this season and what does this mean regarding ‘the process’?

And if they hadn't picked up his 5th year option would they even resign him now? If not, how idiotic would it be to trade 3 draft picks for one year of whatever that was? Serious lose/lose situation 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Clownshow is just repeating the same lines from last year. 
 

The worst QB in the NFL over the last 4 seasons is young and we can fix him.   Just because.  Not because we have ever done it.  Or won in the NFL.  Or had good college QB play. But Matt Rhule’s plan is that he can fix Sam Darnold.  That remains the plan.  Just because. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tbe Grand Master

Tbe

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, NAS said:

That answer alone is a fireable offence.  My hate is turning on Tepper now for keeping this clown arouond.

He gave several answers today that are fireable offenses.

1: This

2: Cam has higher standards than him

3: He doesn’t know what he would do differently.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

By far the lost alarming thing about this mind numbingly idiotic taking non-answer is that this is quite obviously the first time he's fielded this question. Tepper seriously didn't bring this up?

I'm honestly starting to think that Tepper is just in hiding somewhere. Too embarrassed to even acknowledge what is going on and just hoping that somehow, someway the storm clouds will pass and the Panthers will just magically start winning games because he has no clue what to do to fix this mess he's made.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...