Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Tepper showing his COWARDICE


SuperBowlBound
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

David Tepper is straight up bitch made. Brass balls my ass. He fuged up once and he's scared to death he'll fug it up again so he's just desperately hoping things will magically get better.

He didn’t just fug up.  

1.  He hired an unqualified college coach.  But then

2.  He then have that guy a 7 year deal. And then

3. He then made him one of the highest paid and then 

* maybe there is, but we have no confirmation he then even put an offset clause in this contract 

and Matt Rhule is a variation of Tepper when it comes to QB lol. 

and you got to think the other owners hate Tepper of fugging up inflating coaching contracts.  If Matt Rhule gets that….then what should a good and qualified HC get? That’s what other owners have to hear.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Second_Solution said:

I thought Tepper was big on analytics. Stats show that coaches who don't make the playoffs in the first two years more than likely won't have success in the NFL. Look at the data Tepper and make the right call

Is he waiting for Rhule to become an elite coach?! 

Now that's silly. I think it's so embarrassing what he paid this guy he's hoping it'll all fix itself. 

Past the point of no return Teppy...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I was told he has a set of brass balls he received for something and something....none which has to do with being a competent owner. 

Passing on Bienemy was a mistake and like our next draft.. we will make desperate  moves to amend for our past mistakes which means we continue to be a dumpster fire with PJ Walker starting by week 4. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Panther'sBigD said:

You guys are BIG mad, about a game. Hurling insults and writing angry open letters you know aren’t going to make a difference. Y’all are grown men, right? 

Put on your panties and go somewhere else if you want a different audience. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RJK said:

He’s not being a coward lol. Tepper has no obligations to you or anyone else other than the commissioner. It’s HIS team. He OWNS it. I disagree with his decisions so far but he doesn’t owe me any explanation about what he’s doing with his property 

That might be true if he doesn't count on fans putting up millions of dollars to buy tickets. The best thing he has going is that PSL fans have to pay for tickets or sell their PSLs to somebody else at a large discount. If this were only based on season ticket holders who didn't have to renew he would be out there hussling to fill seats with lots of promises.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...