Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mitchell Trubisky is the best play


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

  

12 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

If you guys haven't figured it out yet, no matter whoever Rhule brings in it will be the wrong guy.  You can argue over who would be the best choice all you want. It will not matter.  He could sign Tom Brady and somehow it would end in disaster.  Not to mention whoever it is will cost us dearly, even scrub FA's.

Face it people we are cursed with that guy calling the shots.

carol kane sometimes the truth is painful frank GIF

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2022 at 7:21 AM, Mr. Scot said:

I did.

I have no idea what you're talking about (and I'm guessing most others here don't either).

A while back you were just posting HIGH numbers daily(not the first), it could be this but it also could be this type of open rambling. Just felt like opening the front page and nearly half were your posts. You calmed it down and had a more quality over quantity approach. Just like 4corn, fitz, p55, me, juan, and many others once a while it gets out of hand and someone needs to step in and help. Not my role to tell other how to post, but someone needed too. 

Your posting arc has been one of crazy deals here. I member when you didnt even use twitter and had a lame style with little independent thoughts. Shocking transformation and you even became the clear go-to for coaching information. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/25/2022 at 3:12 PM, Jon Snow said:

If you guys haven't figured it out yet, no matter whoever Rhule brings in it will be the wrong guy.  You can argue over who would be the best choice all you want. It will not matter.  He could sign Tom Brady and somehow it would end in disaster.  Not to mention whoever it is will cost us dearly, even scrub FA's.

Face it people we are cursed with that guy calling the shots.

c2d.jpg.5952b1d634597fdf4a5061e6dd5859a3.jpg

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No matter what we are going to roll with a low tier QB like Darnold, Mitch, Marcus, etc.  There isn't going to be more than a few games plus or minus.  Is 7 wins that much better than 4?  In my eyes, it doesn't matter what retread QB we end up with. 

You either have to trade for a very good QB like Watson and with building a team with all that crap or you build the rest of the team with an eye on gaining assets and looking at QB in the draft over the next 2 years.  Are the QB classes over the next 2 years looking to be at all any good.  I know a lot changes but find a scout who can actually scout college QB's and pay him to do nothing but have the Panthers be as prepared as possible for drafting a QB.

Lay out the next 2 years.

Sucks to say but it's the exact same plan that we began when Rhule stated.  The problem is and has always been finding a franchise QB.

Honestly, if we were trying to put together a team right now for this upcoming year would you rather have Watson with no legal problem and have to find spots for Burns, Brown and Horn or would you rather be in the situation we are in now with those elite players but Darnold or Mitch at QB.

If you can clear up the legal issue, which is a big if, there is no question Watson is not worth 3 1st round picks.  He a proven top tier QB, otherwise we will continue to do what we've been doing for the last 3 years.  Building a quality team which throwing everything but the kitchen sink at finding a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Basbear said:

A while back you were just posting HIGH numbers...

Just felt like opening the front page and nearly half were your posts.

Gretzy'esque...1st ballot HOF 🙌...a circular motion hitherto unknown to the people in this area but destined to take the place of the mudshark in your mythology...here we go... 

PS:  Mitch or Cam next year, who is the better option?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/26/2022 at 9:51 PM, SizzleBuzz said:

Gretzy'esque...1st ballot HOF 🙌...a circular motion hitherto unknown to the people in this area but destined to take the place of the mudshark in your mythology...here we go... 

PS:  Mitch or Cam next year, who is the better option?

Mitch alllllllllllllllllllllllll day and alllllllllllllllllllll night. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he is 10 mil+, hell no.  I'm starting to lean towards the Darnold disaster train 2022 and to simply grab a cheap Hoyer-esque option as a tank commander backup. Just use the cash somewhere else to help with a longer term contract, not this fool. 

(Apparently the Rogers bit is showing, not the Mitch part--but he's supposedly garnering interest and will be upwards toward 10 mil)

 

Edited by davos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...