Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Maybe I was wrong about KENNY PICKETT after reading these evaluations.


Panthers Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I will take the other side of your trade...

In terms of actual talent level it's not even close. Darnold >>>>> Pickett all day long. All things being equal I'd take Pickett over Darnold too but not if it means spending the #6 overall pick. fug that. I'd rather take another fuging CB than drafting Kenny "Baby Hands" Pickett.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shocker said:

This is actually very true as amazing as it seems.  I will laugh out loud whichever team picks him…including us

He's the kinda guy I woulda taken in the 3rd/4th last year and he'd be a decent backup QB for 4 years. Like slightly better than Will Grier

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, unicar15 said:

He should have been the best player in the league.

He was.  

ACC POY.  

ACC Offensive POY.

ACC 1st Team.

NCAA All-America Team.

Johnny Unitas Golden Arm Award.

1 hour ago, unicar15 said:

He sat out for 4 years before becoming good.

Complete horse 🐴 hockey.

KP started 49 games over 5-years and went 33-16 which is amazing for Pitt!

Burrow never started until his 4th year and overall started 21 fewer games than Big KP.

In no way suggesting Big KP will succeed like Burrow but your "sat out for 4 years" is 100% a false narrative and you should knock off phony talk pal 🤦‍♂️

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Interesting stat comparisons. I think his biggest negative is he only had one good season in his 4 as a starter. I kind of prefer Willis because of his upside, or a trade down and get Howell but I’m definitely not against Kenny. 

To be fair, so did Burrow

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pickett's interviews at the Combine were good, which means a lot in the evaluation process.  That's not too much of a surprise since he's the oldest and most experienced prospect there.  

He's got decent physical skills.  Confidence.  Seems to have the maturity to be a leader in the clubhouse. But his upside appears to be more limited than others.  

Maybe worth a late first round pick.  Almost surely not worth #6.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Immaculate said:

Herbert was a talented QB with a strong arm. His problem coming out of college was that he is introvert and not a good leader. Kenny Pickett isn’t Herbert. If you want a QB that has the best chance to be a franchise QB, it’s Malik Willis. I’ll always go with the guy with the arm talent. 

And he threw to one of the worst receiving corps in FBS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could ppl stop being disingenuous when trying to prop up Kenny Pickett 1 × please??

Don't just post 1 season of numbers when he played 5.. 

When comparing him to other QBS compare more then 1 season..

Try to effectively show a progression from year 1 to year 5 not just showing Year 5 and based his whole college career on it...

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...