Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

have you accepted that sam darnold is the week 1 starter yet?


Recommended Posts

Yes; no point in cater walling about what you can't change.  Keep our 1.6 or trade back a little, but get a premier LT or C in the first.  Roll with Darnold; Rhule gets capped and we are set up for a high first round pick next year.  Use vaseline as necessary to improve the inevitable irritation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Panther'sBigD said:

It's what I wanted from the start. It's the toughest option to get excited about/endure, but it gives us the outcome everyone seems to want: Offensive line overhaul, High 2023 first round pick and Rhule fired at some point during the season.   

The only thing I disagree with you about on your statement above is it isn’t just “tough” to get excited about that, its damned IMPOSSIBLE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team needs to tank if they wanna be relevant, the shortcuts they've tried to take have largely blown up in their faces. The team is not a QB away from competing yet, and that's clear, but apparently the plan is to play everything by ear. They give Rhule a long contract and present themselves like theire taking it slow, like the Lions, then immediately start trading draft picks for AnY ole QB. That's not coherent. This is a year to build up your roster bc clearly next year is the year to draft a QB. But they've screwed the pooch so much they've backed themselves into a corner and honestly some folks who post here could've done a better job running the team the last two years. 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm gonna be a grandpa!  My 2 year old son sat on my lap Panther's inaugural season in Clemson.  Die hard fans ever since.  Now he's going to be a daddy and sharing the fan tradition with a custom made shirt.  Check out the little fella in the sonogram (look closely).
    • Watch out now...... I agree but many others disagree with this line of thinking.  I seen a recent summary too- Which would you rather have the best safety or the 8th best edge? Best safety maybe kyle hamilton, the 8th best edge is Maxx Crosby. Id take maxx even with Myles or TJ on the roster. Plus if you don't like Maxx as 8th best, Id take whoever the 8th best edge is over the Kyle.  Panthers need a starter level edge, the only realistic shot is using the 1st rounder. But if somehow a stud LT pulls out a gas mask and falls to 19, draft them if much higher ranked.  The funny deal is those teams drafting in the late portion of drafts don't need edge, QB, WR, or OT..... I wonder why?!??? hmmmmmmm.... plus it pays off for them, cause they do need OG, ILB, TE, safety..... and now they get a top level player to remain great....
    • Wrong conclusion. FOs should look at this and say “What can I do to better set up my top pick to succeed?” Not say welp I guess I just shouldn’t draft the most talented player at the most important position. It’s like saying the Cavaliers shouldn’t have drafted Lebron because they did a poor job building around him and he didn’t start winning championships until he left. It’s silly. Should teams also look and say “wow look at all these super bowls won by QBs drafted in the 5th round, guess that’s the best round to draft a QB.” Nonsense.
×
×
  • Create New...