Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

From observer’s Willis & Alexander why Panthers declined Watson contract demand


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

 Watson seems like an extremely low character egotistical douche. I’m disappointed it took so long and so many ridiculous demands for the Panthers to grow a backbone and stop letting themselves get played.

Hate my Browns got sucked in....but Browns gonna brown..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

They stole my theory…lol. Well put it out there first not stole. But this was one of many reasons to not do this deal. 
 

Was Watson willing to change his entire social life. Not massages. Clubs or any partying where you can be accused of something and any picture from the wrong angle and a just ONE woman who wants some money, and the Panthers are stuck in this mess with a lot more money at stake. I don’t know what Ben R. did, and I’ve thought he was a D-bag before the accusations, but he got married to a Dr. and never put himself in the position to be accused again. Is Watson going today to do that in CLE. Edit: And there is no telling what any womens rights groups might have planned. Maybe nothing. I have no clue. But it’s 2022 and I would never speak for what matters to anyone else. 

 

  Add that to injury risk(like any player) and he could easily get pissed and pull this crap again on his new team. 
 

  This year is basically shot if he gets suspended for 8 games. In a division with the Bengals, Ravens and Steelers it’s hard to imagine contending with him out half the year. 
 

  The theory that Tepper would let him pick the next HC. Didn’t believe that, although please hire Brian Flores and get the Steelers two extra 3rds. He’s a very good/great player but that’s crazy. His resume isn’t loaded with rational decisions and it’s ridiculous to give a player control. Just sign the team over to him. 
 

If someone said would you give Watson 5/230M guaranteed before any of his off - field issues, is it an immediate yes? More than Mahomes or anyone? Even if you say well, ok, we can build around him. Whoa? Not so fast. You also lose the 5 best resources to help with that building. And possibly a valuable resource you already have. How about now? The Panthers were fortunate someone came to their senses They seem to be doing well in FA. Just keep making good decisions and the wins will come. 

I think the concern was the NFL could hold of on his suspension until after his civil trial which could take a couple of years. It's possible he could be suspended multiple games or indefinitely depending on the outcome and 150m for 3 years against the cap with no way to recover it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fan01 said:

I don't believe this for a second.

I do. 
 

I was listening to PFT today and it was recorded before the trade went down. They were talking about Von Miller and his 6-year deal. They weren’t talking about Watson at all. What they said was this…All NFL contracts get a guaranteed max of 2 years. That’s it. If you’re a superstar you MAY get 3-4 years. Take CMC for example. He is/was a superstar when he signed a 4-year $64 million contract. How much for each year? Answer: $16mil. How much guaranteed? Answer: $38 mil. 
 

That is roughly 2-1/3 years of guaranteed money. Basically exactly what PFT said.

Watson was asking for DOUBLE the amount of guarantee a normal SUPERSTAR player gets….and he has to sit out. AND…if he gets suspended or something else comes out on him. He’s owed every dime of that contract regardless. That is plainly INSANE. 
 

Tepper did his homework for a year+ on this player. PIs and all. He wanted him. If he wasn’t comfortable making those guarantees then truthfully…nobody should have been. Period. We’ll see how it plays out. Maybe bc it’s The Browns…Bur I just think it plays out badly. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I think the concern was the NFL could hold of on his suspension until after his civil trial which could take a couple of years. It's possible he could be suspended multiple games or indefinitely depending on the outcome and 150m for 3 years against the cap with no way to recover it. 

Could be another valid reason. I haven’t followed it enough to know. I was going under the assumption they would be settled before the season. And if they aren’t, we have to wonder what sort of protests could come?  If any at all?  So many variables that could wreck this. And how does a HC even speak to him? The coach pisses him off in any way and guess who’s leaving? Not the QB with the guaranteed contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, unicar15 said:

I do. 
 

I was listening to PFT today and it was recorded before the trade went down. They were talking about Von Miller and his 6-year deal. They weren’t talking about Watson at all. What they said was this…All NFL contracts get a guaranteed max of 2 years. That’s it. If you’re a superstar you MAY get 3-4 years. Take CMC for example. He is/was a superstar when he signed a 4-year $64 million contract. How much for each year? Answer: $16mil. How much guaranteed? Answer: $38 mil. 
 

That is roughly 2-1/3 years of guaranteed money. Basically exactly what PFT said.

Watson was asking for DOUBLE the amount of guarantee a normal SUPERSTAR player gets….and he has to sit out. AND…if he gets suspended or something else comes out on him. He’s owed every dime of that contract regardless. That is plainly INSANE. 
 

Tepper did his homework for a year+ on this player. PIs and all. He wanted him. If he wasn’t comfortable making those guarantees then truthfully…nobody should have been. Period. We’ll see how it plays out. Maybe bc it’s The Browns…Bur I just think it plays out badly. 

It's pretty crazy, aside from the Browns taking on the extra guaranteed money, the fact that Watson tacked on the bonus money so he'd get paid during suspension is just dark. Makes me think he knows he's gonna look bad in the civil trials and the NFL is gonna be in a really awkward position. All that BIg Ben stuff went down way before everyone had Twitter and he still got 6 games 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

It's pretty crazy, aside from the Browns taking on the extra guaranteed money, the fact that Watson tacked on the bonus money so he'd get paid during suspension is just dark. Makes me think he knows he's gonna look bad in the civil trials and the NFL is gonna be in a really awkward position. All that BIg Ben stuff went down way before everyone had Twitter and he still got 6 games 

My speculation:  The bonus money was done for several reasons.

1) it changed his cap hit this year to a much lower number since the bonus will be split across the length of the contract for cap reasons.  I doubt the browns could fit him under the cap without at least some restructuring since Mayfield still is under his 5th year option. 

2) as you said, watson is protecting himself from losing large sums if and when he is suspended by having a much lower salary.  This does seem unfair as he is getting rewarded for this whole mess he is in.

3) I'm pretty sure the restructure bonus will be paid immediately as a huge lump sum.  Around 50m I believe.  Anybody would rather get that upfront rather than doled out in a regular salary.

 

Edited by w280sax
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, w280sax said:

My speculation:  The bonus money was done for several reasons.

1) it changed his cap it this year to a much lower number since the bonus will be split across the length of the contract for cap reasons.  I doubt the browns could fit him under the cap without at least some restructuring since Mayfield still is under his 5th year option. 

2) as you said, watson is protecting himself from losing large sums if and when he is suspended by having a much lower salary.  This does seem unfair as he is getting rewarded for this whole mess he is in.

3) I'm pretty sure the restructure bonus will be paid immediately as a huge lump sum.  Around 50m I believe.  Anybody would rather get that upfront rather than doled out in a regular salary.

 

He better throw Case Keenum some extra cash on the side for starting the first half of the season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Find it funny that Watson claimed LOYALTY was so important to him, and then demanded a trade because the Texans weren't LOYAL to their word on their Coaching search. Watson then spurns the one team that stayed LOYAL in their pursuit of him. To top it all off, Watson reached out to Atlanta who hadn't made any attempt to that point, gotta love that LOYALTY!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You honestly think Tampa would have traded down with a division rival so their rival could land a “generational player” at a massive position of need for TB?   bruh
    • Ya'll better quit throwing shots at Zod. He'll come in here and ban everybody. I had a friend @prosource who was banned in 2015 because he said some very minor things about Zod being an ass to the posters on the main forum after starting the All-Pro one. He said he felt like another level is cool, but don't punch down on people that don't want All-Pro. (He did say that it wasn't going to last long anyways.🤔) I distinctly remember him calling and being like "dude, I got banned, my profile says I don't have access to the Huddle!") I feel like once Tepper came in and cut off all unofficial access to the team, Zod was going to be around less. The All-Pro board had really good photos, even in game stuff, and I remember seeing him behind a little fenced in area at Wofford for non team sanctioned press/photographers after Tepper bought the team. I knew then his ego wouldn't allow him to continue with past fervency and effort with that reduction in access. Dude was literally in the locker room when JR was owner.  I came over in 2011 immediately after finding out this place existed. I was super involved with the Charlotte forum, and fell off after its demise. I will never forget arguing Pep over Ryan Sims on that forum! Who is Ryan Sims some of you may ask? My answer is exactly!
    • And not see him running free. Because has been free a lot more than he gets credit for.    Now what XL does with that when he does see the ball, is on him. 
×
×
  • Create New...