Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Unverified and unsubstantiated....Panthers Closing in on Trade for Love

Biggdaddi1022

By Biggdaddi1022,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, BrianS said:

 

No, in fact, this is the opposite of what people said last offseason.  Last offseason we were saying there hasn't been such a promising group of QB's in a long, long time.

lol no, they weren’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ATLpanther Enthusiast

ATLpanther

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CmC2k said:

Love is better than both Willis and Pickett and if we can get him for something cheap like a next year 3rd and our extra 5th this year, I'd absolutely do it. If it doesn't work out, you're only really out a 3rd and you can just move on and draft a QB next year in a better class and with hopefully better coaching staff. 

There’s a reason that the Packers resigned Rodgers for record money. Love is a bust. I rather roll with Darnold behind a revamped OL than give even a late round pick for Love. I’m done with the knee jerk bandaid projects

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

I feel like if we get Jimmy G we are right back to where we were 2 years ago with Bridgewater. 
Can the front office not see that? Yes he was in the Super Bowl and almost a second last year. 
But context matters, they weren’t in either situation because of Jimmy G and they lost both because of him. 
Front Offices needs to take of their blinders and realize that maybe the success of a team is because of the team and not because of the person under center. That is how we got Bridgewater. Because the office thought it was because of him the Saints went 5-0 with him and not because the defense played their best games during that 5 game stretch. Other than the Bucs game Bridgewaters stats were pretty meh. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

I feel like if we get Jimmy G we are right back to where we were 2 years ago with Bridgewater. 
Can the front office not see that? Yes he was in the Super Bowl and almost a second last year. 
But context matters, they weren’t in either situation because of Jimmy G and they lost both because of him. 
Front Offices needs to take of their blinders and realize that maybe the success of a team is because of the team and not because of the person under center. That is how we got Bridgewater. Because the office thought it was because of him the Saints went 5-0 with him and not because the defense played their best games during that 5 game stretch. Other than the Bucs game Bridgewaters stats were pretty meh. 

Bridgewater still hasn't been the starting QB of a team that has gone to a SB and another Conference Championship. Whatever you say negates your whole argument. Crappy QBs don't do that. The shitting on Jimmy G on this board is unwarranted. Yeah you can be warry of him because of his shoulder surgery, but I keep seeing comparisons to Bridgewater, Darnold, and w/e crappy QB you can come up with and it is complete bullshit.

Myself, I am warry because of his recent surgery and would rather go after Baker instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, ATLpanther said:

There’s a reason that the Packers resigned Rodgers for record money. Love is a bust. I rather roll with Darnold behind a revamped OL than give even a late round pick for Love. I’m done with the knee jerk bandaid projects

Keep in mind Love has had elite coaching as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WUnderhill
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      Let’s be real, there’s no way the Bengals can trade him for less than first round value from an optics stand point.
    • MHS831
      The Franchise guy Panthers 2025 deep dive overview

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Disclaimer:  In June, I am usually optimistic.  In October, a policeman with a bullhorn is telling me that I have a lot of life ahead of me and to think about my loved ones as I gaze down upon him from my rooftop.   Having said that, I think our offense (down the stretch) was good enough to play KC and Philly tough.  So how many games would this offense have won if they played the entire season like they did in November-January and if they had a better defense?   If you could stretch the last nine games over an entire season and put a solid defense on the other side, I see 5 wins becoming 7 or 8.  Down the stretch, the Panther D surrendered 30 points or more in 5 of the final 7 games and managed to win 2 of those 5.  If they can win 40% of games in which their defense surrenders 30 points or more, then the math indicates, had that been the case all season, the Panthers should have won 6 or 7 games with their defense surrendering 30+ points.   This season, we are much better at WR (TMac, Renfrow, Horn, and I expect XL to be a lot better).  Bryce is confident and now a leader.    The Achilles' heel of the 2024 defense, the DL, seems to be very solid.  We got back Horn and Jackson on the corners, Smith-Wade is improving better than expected, we signed a stud Safety.  Derrick Brown returns.  While the D is not there yet, it is going to be better.   So if we ended the second half of 2024 playing at a level that should have produced 6-7 wins, better WRs and a better defense could result in 9 wins or more.       
    • MHS831
      The Franchise guy Panthers 2025 deep dive overview

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Those bastids.  
×
×
  • Create New...