Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Per sources, the #Panthers have had conversations with Cam Newton regarding a return


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Honestly, I think if we can get a stud lt in the draft, I'd be OK with this.  It would be awesome to see cam at his best again surrounded with a solid line and weapons.

I still feel like cam could dominate again if everything went right.

We need a viable backup in about any route we can take now.

Edited by w280sax
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam in a Taysom Hill roll, coming in on short yardage and redzone opportunities is still deadly.  Expecting Cam to start and play an every down roll is just asinine at this point.  As long as he understands his roll as the backup and short yardage back on the offense, and the money works there is no downside to this whatsoever.  Cam would be an excellent mentor to any young QB, and he just elevates the team and the teams chemistry.  If they expect him to start all year and act as a bridge QB kiss this season goodbye because he's not that guy anymore.  

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they draft Willis Cam will be signed I bet. Willis gets a true redshirt year to develop and Darnold/Cam is 1st/2nd string. You sign a vet LT and compete with your franchise QB starting next year. That is what I would do anyway…..as make believe GM.

80DE210F-36CD-4E1D-B8E7-E958CF77CA5F.jpeg

Edited by WarPanthers89
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...