Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, who do you like at QB?


MHS831
 Share

Forget trade backs and veteran trades--who would you like to see as the New QB in 2022?  

112 members have voted

  1. 1. Select one:

    • Baker Mayfield
      7
    • Jimmy Garappolo
      8
    • Malik Willis
      31
    • Sam Howell
      12
    • Kenny Pickett
      22
    • Matt Corral
      27
    • Desmond Ridder
      5

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/01/2022 at 03:03 AM

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, jfo89 said:

RG3 was a pro bowler his rookie year. I would take that. Injuries could derail anyone’s career.

RG3 was very good. I always thought so. However, I also believed he wouldn't survive the NFL if he continued to play that way. RG3 and Corral are almost exactly the same size and play with the same style. With players like that, you must ask yourself if they can still be as good if they play differently. If not then it's only a matter of time before the inevitable happens. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give me Jimmy G and here’s why….

If he’s our next QB, it’s likely because he was cut by SF and we’ve signed him for the year or we’ve swapped Darnold for him. That wouldn’t tie us down to someone we’re unsure of or mortgage our future by trading picks. We can still go BPA at #6 and he’d be a nicel bridge to our next (hopeful franchise) QB in ‘23. 


San Howell in a trade back scenario would be my next pick. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

I’ve been on the Corral train out of this group for awhile now, but ultimately I want a LT and hope we draft a QB next year. Granted seeing another year of Darnold isn’t very appealing but I think we can really build a strong Oline with a LT for our rookie next year if we go this route

I concur person

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can trade down and get an extra pick or so out of it from say Philly and Pickett is still there I say a combo of him and Linderbaum is extremely solid. Depending on who is there at 6 of course. If either Neal or Ekwonu is there either one should be the unquestioned pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...