Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ellis - "When it comes to big time issues, like quarterback, the owner is pretty involved."


trueblade
 Share

Recommended Posts

Let me do a little Twitter housekeeping here. 

Being “pretty involved” is vague, so let me translate: He’s the owner, and when it comes to cornerstone decisions, such as sizing up their next swing at a franchise quarterback, my understanding is he’ll be an active participant in that decision. Same as he was during the bulk of their pursuit of Watson.   

I don’t think this is an outrageous statement. Luckily, I’m in a nice position in my life, in which I don’t have to log onto the Internet and make things up.

So, that’s what I was getting at, and I hope that helps.

 

Edited by ellis
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to argue that the two most powerful people in that building, football/otherwise, are the owner, followed by the HC. It appears the general manager has less resistance and more cooperation this year. That’s not to imply there was ever a conflict, that’s just the nature of the business.  

I don’t think I’m alone in that assessment. 

I don’t think any of this is really groundbreaking, like I said.

Edited by ellis
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ellis said:

Hard to argue that the two most powerful people in that building, football/otherwise, are the owner, followed by the HC. It appears the general manager has less resistance and more cooperation this year. That’s not to imply there was ever a conflict, that’s just the nature of the business.  

I don’t think I’m alone in that assessment. 

I don’t think any of this is really groundbreaking, like I said.

I always appreciate your posts 

it is really difficult to believe that Tepper approved the Darnold trade.
 

If he did, zero respect for him. I know  I know. He doesn’t care about my respect or anyone else’s 

but, I guess that’s just as believable as hiring a mediocre Div 1 coach, paying him more than the very best pro coaches, and handing him the keys to a nfl franchise with Marty Hurney as the doorman

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

Sam Darnold never showed he was special last year.   

he did have a bad staff around him.  But we have 4 years of Sam Darnold as starting QB in the NFL.  He isn't a starter.  He isn't being held back.  He simply is part of the offensive problem with the staff. 

I know, I'm just yanking your chain.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

How do we know Tepper likes Pickett the most aside from the Pitt connection? He liked Fields last year who is like the opposite of Pickett…

This is the right question. Do we have any actual intel that he prefer Pickett over Willis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MechaZain said:

I'd be concerned if he wasn't involved.

I'm more concerned if he is.

It's kind of like a guy who knows nothing about home building hiring experienced builders, then deciding  he doesn't like the way they're doing it so he's going to tell them how to do their job...or just do it himself.

The correct action would be to hire a different builder, of course. But when you're one of those people who always thinks you're the smartest person in the room (even when you're clearly the dumbest) this is how things often play out 

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm more concerned if he is.

It's kind of like a guy who knows nothing about home building hiring experienced builders, then deciding  he doesn't like the way they're doing it so he's going to tell them how to do their job...or just do it himself.

The correct action would be to hire a different builder, of course. But when you're one of those people who always thinks you're the smartest person in the room (even when you're clearly the dumbest) this is how things often play out 

Owners (or CEO's) are always involved in big decisions, even if it's out of their realm of expertise. You may have a CEO whose head of a dept store company, whose specialty is retail operations, but he will be involved in major real estate acquisitions as well, even though he really doesn't know much on the subject.

Here's another example. I'm going to upgrade my company's fleet of work trucks. Before I drop 300 grand on vehicles, I'm going to clear it with the owner, who has never changed the oil on his vehicle once in his life. And if he doesn't like Ford, we won't be buying F250's. Or maybe he feels we need F350's or maybe F150's, etc. At any rate, his opinion will be involved in the decision, and he'll have final decision. He may leave that decision broad for others to decide the fine details, but he'll have some sort of input into it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Luciu5 said:

Owners (or CEO's) are always involved in big decisions, even if it's out of their realm of expertise. You may have a CEO whose head of a dept store company, whose specialty is retail operations, but he will be involved in major real estate acquisitions as well, even though he really doesn't know much on the subject.

Here's another example. I'm going to upgrade my company's fleet of work trucks. Before I drop 300 grand on vehicles, I'm going to clear it with the owner, who has never changed the oil on his vehicle once in his life. And if he doesn't like Ford, we won't be buying F250's. Or maybe he feels we need F350's or maybe F150's, etc. At any rate, his opinion will be involved in the decision, and he'll have final decision. He may leave that decision broad for others to decide the fine details, but he'll have some sort of input into it.

I get that owners always want to be involved, but the smart ones who hire smart people listen to those people.

When it comes to football matters, I've not seen a single thing that made me think David Tepper is very smart.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not all talent can be measured with a ruler and stopwatch. His hands, body control, and skills were ELITE. 
    • He did have talent, but if you look at his combine/workout numbers...they are not eye popping like many of the combine freaks are. All the best have talent, smarts, and work ethic. What he was able to do in his 40s, he holds all the records after 40. He had two 1k seasons at 39 and 40, no other WR has 1k after 36. He came back from a ACL tear within 9 months after he turned 35 years old. You know this is the era where ACl was a career derail-er and it took most mortal men took a full 12 months and they were never the same. Only two other players have made catches at that age (40) and neither one was a wide receiver. LOL at Tom being one of them....   I also read or heard, he would have still played if not for ST. He was going to play for the broncos in 2006, I think he would have been 44???, he earned a spot as the #4-6 but the numbers game of having WRs play ST ended his career. He could still get open and play, just no sense in having the GOAT run head first into a wedge on KO duties.....
    • With a strong finish to the season, he has a real chance at being just the 3rd Panther to make the Pro Bowl in their rookie season (and just the 2nd as a non special teamer) after Cam and Smitty. He won't make it on the original selections, not over JSN, Puka, Pickens, St Brown, London, Jefferson who should all finish with at least the same amount of yards and TDs, if not more.  No rookie is getting selected over all those big name vets with similar statistical seasons. But a couple injuries and/or reaching the NFC Championship and pulling out of the Pro Bowl, he very well could be one of the first couple alternates and end up making it.  Last year the NFC ended up with 7 WRs making it in the end after players who pulled out got replaced.
×
×
  • Create New...