Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Are The Chances that Christian McCaffrey Stays Healthy?


Pantha-kun
 Share

What Are the Chances that Christian McCaffrey Actually Stays Healthy?  

103 members have voted

  1. 1. Serious question. Do you think he'll actually stay healthy this season? If he does that would be huge.

    • 100%
      4
    • 95%
      1
    • 90%
      3
    • 80%
      8
    • 70%
      14
    • 60%
      7
    • 50%
      19
    • 40%
      8
    • 30%
      5
    • 20%
      9
    • 10%
      0
    • Below 10%
      1
    • No chance. He's already injury prone and they will just keep accumulating until he retires sadly.
      23


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, panthers55 said:

I know it isn't credible because I talked to a guy who say he talked to a guy who is close to Christian and knows that CMC doesn't want to run up the middle anymore, he wants to be used more like Kamara. In space and out of the backfield on swing passes.  They said he will never complain and will do what is asked but feels his injuries are due to how he is being used.  Take it for what it is worth but I thought it was worthy of discussion. But I doubt he wants to stay if he is going to be beaten to death or he will last if we don't change how we use him.

It's our lines job to get him to the second level untouched. 

They are to blame period. Cmac against nothing but LBs and DBs is another story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's the argument you always have with a star player.

Limit their usage to save wear and tear but risk blunting their effectiveness, or play them to maximum usage at the risk of shortening their careers?

We had this same debate over how much to use Newton as a runner.

I hesitate to even call it limiting his usage because we don't need to give him the Todd Gurley treatment, just not the highest snapcount in the entire league like we've been. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been on the "move him to the slot" train since he signed the extension reasoning that contact was terrible for a RB, which reality had proven, but good for att rb/slot hybrid.

Just use him exactly like we used Samuel and he'll easily give us a 1000 yards a season.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The RB position is the most often injured position in football. Some of you like to pretend CMC is anomaly in this department when the real anomaly was him playing 98% of snaps 3 consecutive years WITHOUT injury. 
 

We are beating the hell out of this horse.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...