Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers will attack with CMC, despite potential injury potential (Reed)


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Whether you like it or not, CMC won't be put in bubble wrap. But, honestly, he's paid to play.

Steve Reed's latest article should answer the question as to whether Christian McCaffrey will be purposefully limited in any kind of way this season. If Rhule has any say about the matter, which we all know that he does, it's full steam ahead.

“I’m not spending my time worrying about, ‘hey, will Christian get hurt?’” Panthers coach Matt Rhule said. “We are thinking about Christian in one way only — and that’s attack.

 

For Christian's part, he has done what he can to lessen the potential for injury, including modifying his offseason workout regimen, but he's all about playing as well.

“If I’ve learned anything in terms of techniques, it’s just not overdoing it,” McCaffrey said. "I think that has been my issue — overdoing it sometimes. But you can’t prevent everything. Football is a tough business and a tough sport.”

 

I've heard Christian say earlier this offseason, that he's had few little nagging injuries that take time to heal, but nothing major. And along with that train of thought is the notion that he's doing what he can do, but some things just aren't preventable (and bad luck).

 

“I had a couple 300-pound guys fall on my ankle while I was already down,” McCaffrey said. "... I would love to know if there is a drill someone has got out there to prevent that from happening, because I would do that every day.”

 

So, good or bad, McCaffrey looks to get his touches. Let's hope that CMC's bad luck with the injuries is a thing that's mitigated.

 

https://www.wralsportsfan.com/panthers-to-attack-with-mccaffrey-not-worry-about-injuries/20411727/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

There's a big difference between utilizing CMC as a huge part of our offense versus having him play 99% of the snaps and still playing late in games when the game is already decided

A big reason why D-Will and JStew were so good in their primes was because they were able to keep each other fresh and not having to over work themselves into injuries

DeAngelo and Stewart both had a ton of injuries...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope somewhat decent QB play (which we've definitely not had the last 2.5 years) will decrease our reliance on CMC to be the bulk of our offense.

I understand the whole he's paid to play, and he's a unique weapon. But damn, there's a smart way to use a weapon. We treat CMC like a knife on Forged in Fire.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's neither on Ickey nor Bryce, that's a coverage sack. There were plenty of examples where he drifted into pressure or didn't move in the right direction, but on this play we sent two men out deep and Max Protected with both TEs and the RB staying back to block. Both receivers were completely covered down the field with zero checkdown options and the pass rush got home. Bryce took a deep drop back due to the PA and to let the receivers get deeper. That was the play design This sack isn't "Clearly on the QB". There were plenty of examples where Bryce drifts in the pocket or bailed toward pressure last season (open up a random clip from the Jags game for examples), but this is not one of them. Blame Frank and his dumbass playcalling/design for sending two slow receivers who don't get open well on deep routes with no other options on this one.
    • Some things look horrible but you had the position covered. Some things look horrible because they really were.
    • Well this one is more like it, 28-3 Falcons in the 3rd before I just stopped.  Sorry.  Bryce lovers: watch the Chicago game not this one. Bet the farm on Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...