Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Myles Garrett calls relationship with Baker Mayfield “slightly complicated,” admits “some disagreements”


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Please tell me we're giving Ickey help this Sunday...

 

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

McAdoo said he wasn't going to be alone in protection but did say that Ickey has to be able to hold his own 1 on 1 at times. 

QB roll outs to the right. Someone tell McAdoo and thank me later. 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Out of context or whatever I have no clue what his point is. Baker was a good teammate and invited guys out to dinner but it was weird? Maybe because Stefanski and Garrett didn't want him? The "adult" and "character concerns" don't really add up, just a guy that played hurt the whole season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Out of context or whatever I have no clue what his point is. Baker was a good teammate and invited guys out to dinner but it was weird? Maybe because Stefanski and Garrett didn't want him? The "adult" and "character concerns" don't really add up, just a guy that played hurt the whole season

I think the "but it was weird" was in reference to "...but Baker was a good teammate too, you know I hung out with the offense guys too and..." (obviously paraphrased). I don't think he meant it was weird that Baker took him to dinner / was weird himself, but the SITUATION was weird (which seems likely based on Garrett's comments)

edit: Yeah, the end he talks about "those relationships" being f'd, and he seems to be referring to the wider team relationships, rather than his with Baker.

Edited by mav1234
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To me, this seems like they feel they aren't going to be competitive. I can't help but go back to Bryce. Good guy, but he doesn't inspire people to give it their all. He isn't a "leader" that people look to. There is no Smith, Delhomme, Kuechly, Cam, etc. coming in that door.  It has to be Bryce, but biologically speaking, how often is the shortest man in the room going to command the kind of respect that will drive people? It just isn't. That isn't how we are wired. That isn't how any living animal on Earth today is wired.  I just follow the science guys. 
    • Vick's issue with Reid was that he couldn't take a hit, and he wouldn't go down. Otherwise he was pretty good much of the time.  Mahomes has a system that works. Mahomes doesn't become Mahomes elsewhere because not everyone can extract 125% of the ability of a specific player like Reid can. Kevin O'Connell is beginning to look like he has that ability as well but I'll need to see how he does with his Redshirt Freshman.  I also wonder how much of their playoff issue last year was related to the offense as a whole and not just Darnold. Fans don't really dive into the "why" things happen, they just see the what and complain about it. 
×
×
  • Create New...