Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule on Why CMC lack of rushes


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Matt Rhule is a used car salesman.  He says whatever he has to in the moment.   

Ben McAdoo has always thrown at a higher clip than Joe Brady did.  

 

 

 

Yep

he was so relaxed in his press conference…almost makes one think he has another job already 

if I was a HC that made the freaking Browns look like rock stars, I can assure I would not have had that demeanor 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Did he already forget we just got beat by a team that ran for 217 yards and only threw 138 yards at 4 yards per catch?

You can't make this crap up. It's beyond idiotic for him to step up to a microphone and open his mouth.  He should just stick to yes and no answers. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know the Browns coaching staff was laughing like crazy throughout the game. We didn’t utilize CMC who is the best (some would say only) star on the team, and we suck ass at defending the only threat that the team has (running the football). They dared us to throw the football all game, and we should have done the same. Coaching makes a difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sgt Schultz said:

So let me understand this.  We are preparing (or not) for a game against the Cleveland Browns.  We have a brand new rookie LT and a QB who is starting his first game for us.  Our rookie LT is more proficient at run blocking than pass blocking right now, which makes sense because it allows him to attack.  He is playing opposite a DE who is perhaps the best pass rushing DE in the game, and if not the best, on the short list.

Yet we decide to minimize the run because, over the course of the season, teams that win throw the football.

Uh, Matt.  Newsflash.  Teams that win in the NFL generally do so by creating game plans to play to their own strengths, protect their weaknesses, and attack opponents weaknesses.  Creating a game plan against a specific opponent based on an observation of all teams over the course of a season is, well, curious.

HOUSTON WE HAVE A PROBLEM Poster | FF | Keep Calm-o-Matic

You're not the only one asking...

 

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's hilarious about that quote is that he's exactly right and it's something I wish I heard him say early on in his process here. The best teams in the NFL do throw the ball and they do it well. When I heard him go on that stupid running the ball rant last year I rolled my eyes at it and just knew he's another dinosaur in this league.

So this is weirdly encouraging, too bad I've already seen enough of this guy to know he's a bit over his head in this league and we're all just waiting this one out more than likely. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Conspiracy theory:  They only spoke to one TE (based on the list I saw) and it was Joly.  They are telling us:  If we draft a TE, it will be day 3, and it will be Joly or we will stay with what we have.  
    • THE WALKER BACKGROUND Here is where this gets weird.  Walker is a serviceable LT who could benefit from Gilbert's experience and coaching.  However, he is known for below-average run blocking and frequent penalties.  As you know, a penalty from a LT is a drive killer. A former 7th round pick, Walker has outperformed expectations, but he still ranks around the middle of the pack when compared to other tackles.  Having said that, it seems as if the Panthers are banking on Walker for a year and will then make a decision on Ickey.  In Green Bay, Walker was the starter, but the Packers weren't exactly sold on him. While most people think the oft-injured David Bakhtiari retired in 2023, he really wanted to keep playing.  He was released on March, 11, 2024.  Walker stepped in and took the reserve LT job from Nijman in that 2023 season, but they were close--probably because Nijman was more of a swing OT.  However, Nijman was a free agent in 2024, so the Panthers signed him just a week after Bakhtiari was released, leaving the Packers only Walker to play LT.  A month later, the Packers drafted a LT in the first round, Jordan Morgan out of Arizona.  Most Packer fans believe that Morgan would have beat out Walker for the LT job in 2024, but he had some shoulder injuries and went to IR after 6 games. In 2025, when the Packers had an injury at G during the season, instead of putting Morgan in at LT for Walker as planned, they played Morgan to guard because Walker can only play 1 position.  The Packers currently project Morgan back to LT for 2026, which is probably why they did not seek to retain Walker, at least in part. Based on this history, it is safe to say this: Walker is better than Nijman. We have the benefit of them being on the same team in a direct competition to help us see that. Walker is probably closer to Ickey, except for the penalties.  That bothers me a lot.  Bryce sucks when we get behind the sticks, and a run-first offense with a poor run-blocking LT is not ideal.   Regardless, I think Ickey and the Panthers find themselves in limbo right now, so the Walker deal comes at a perfect time for the GM.  Gilbert, perhaps, can work on the penalties and maybe a TE like Tremble can help offset the run blocking issues, so maybe we can actually stay the course at OT.  Maybe we do not draft a LT--maybe we draft a RT to groom behind Moton.  Maybe we draft a C.  At LT, the Panthers do not want to overreact, especially if Ickey returns to form or Walker demonstrates improvement.  Depth is certainly a concern, but a solid RT can be that depth.   I doubt the Panthers draft a LT in rounds one or maybe two.  It seems we have bigger needs at Will LB, DT, TE, and maybe S.  
    • THIS! IF we go offense at 19, it should be the trenches, which is no longer a pressing need with Waler's signing. 3 biggest needs in 2026, IMO, are DT, FS, ILB. We need to upgrade our starters at those positions and I expect anyone rafted at 19 to start immediately. I could rationalize OT (right or left) or CB since we're an injury away from a severe drop off AND have huge offseason concerns at both next year. Unless Bryce plays a lot better, I want to upgrade QB next year so I could get behind locking in a 2027 starter this year if the right guy is there. You COULD argue NCB and TE are positions where we need to upgrade our starters, sure, but not at 19. Both positions can still be upgraded on day 2.
×
×
  • Create New...