Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is there any reason to keep Robbie Anderson after this year?


Snake
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Damn it.   Makes me hate fitt and Hurley even more.   No good reason to extend either of the two. 
 

so we have to wait until the off season to trade cmac?

Yep. And it still costs about 19M then. Which should go well with the 20M hole that’s already been dug. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way you trade CMAC for a first. He is the Panthers at this point. The man can do it all and you wanna give him up for another Derrick Brown?  Our roster isn't terrible. Seems like Snow is making our defense look worse than it should be and we are only an offensive line away from having a manageable offense if we had a decent Head Coach.

Edited by Cam Lawter
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Robbie personally but as far as production goes it's common sense he is not what we had hoped for and if not for the Temple connection we never would have brought him in at all. I remember when we thought wide receiver was going to be a strength for the first time in many years. We do have some talent there but it isn't helping we have so much incompetence on staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our receiving corps is pretty bare bones at this point but he's definitely not worth $22 million. He's either a candidate for a contract restructuring or a cap casualty. The problem is replacing his production. TMJ showing anything would really help make the decision easier. Ultimately I think maybe you add a year, cut his base salary down and turn it into a 2 year $22 million deal. That way you have a neglible effect on your cap compared to cutting him outright and we don't have to be desperate to replace him. If he refuses, then cut him.

Edited by Peon Awesome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

a bunch of us said that playing thr Saints with our salary cap on a bad team was not a good idea. well here we are.

My biggest question for the new staff is will they just eat these stupid cap decisions to just get it over with or will they phase them out when they can while makeing the most  due to how all the cap was just being pusbed back on a bunch of guys who the new staff probibly won't want?

Our cap specialist is someone that can GTFO with Rhule while we are at it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's a good feeney spin move that I never remember big money having. Plus I had forgotten that Charles is Panthers all-time sack leader. I havnt got a read on nic, he's awful young and talented. He talks about effort and wants to stop the run. I need to see him in live action, then maybe its nickname or former panther name time for me.
    • Not trying to be melodramatic but from a corporate standpoint there is a big push for data security and privacy pertaining to personal information.  Someone mentioned in the other thread about suing the kid but the only place there is possible money is him suing the Falcons organization for negligence related to the leaked personal information.   At best, Shedur makes some added bank and the Falcons look like fools while this circus plays out. At worst, he’ll get free credit monitoring for a year or two. 
    • I met Shaq at an OTA---if you recall, he was absent until the end due to Washington being on the quarter system. He was very nice--soft spoken--but I was thinking "Linebacker?" As an OLB in a 4-3, he was small.  I did not see 6'0"--I saw 5'10-5'11 tops and maybe 220.  When we converted to a 3-4, that moved him inside and, in my opinion, shortened his career.  He just does not have the frame for ILB duties.  If you watch enough film, you will see that Shaq often was late getting to the hole and tackled from the side a lot.  Morgan and Luke were in the hole square with the LOS and talking on blocks and RBs head on.  Had Shaq met pulling guards and fullbacks in the hole like that, he would not have lasted 4 years. He had a very frail frame. 
×
×
  • Create New...