Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Orlovsky on the Panthers

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
1 minute ago, Snake said:

The fact that Mayfield didn't get a ton of time to study the playbook may very well be the cause of this. As the season goes on it should change. If it doesn't ooof.

That excuse has already been used for the suckage. We need different excuses. 

  • Pie 9
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Snake said:

The fact that Mayfield didn't get a ton of time to study the playbook may very well be the cause of this. As the season goes on it should change. If it doesn't ooof.

Or the fact is Rhule's a college coach and can't handle a complex offense so he's hired simplistic offensive coordinators

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
BrianS Veteran

BrianS

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Quarterback is not our problem.  Teams with lesser QB's are finding ways to win.  The Falcons put up 27 on the Rams with Marcus Mariota at QB.  The Cowboys score 20 with Cooper Rush.  The Browns scored 30 with Brissett.

Honestly tired of the excuse that QB is our problem.  Rivera won five games with Kyle freaking Allen as his starting QB.  I'm not saying we're going deep in the playoffs with Baker as our QB.  I'm not sure Baker is the guy.  But he's not the reason we are where we are.

 

  • Pie 25
  • Beer 6
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

I don't understand what McAdoo is doing with Moore and CMC.  It's bewildering how ineffective he's made them.  Brady at least had plays built into his rather bland playbook that were tailored to get them space and work with their strengths. 

If anything, I think Brady may have had the right idea but it was way too simplified and easily figured out.

McAdoo just has the wrong idea.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Or the fact is Rhule's a college coach and can't handle a complex offense so he's hired simplistic offensive coordinators

I don't think McAdoo's offense has been simplistic at his past jobs.

That said, I haven't been impressed with what I've seen so far of his Panthers offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
unicar15 Experienced

unicar15

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, davos said:

I don't understand what McAdoo is doing with Moore and CMC.  It's bewildering how ineffective he's made them.  Brady at least had plays built into his rather bland playbook that were tailored to get them space and work with their strengths. 

If anything, I think Brady may have had the right idea but it was way too simplified and easily figured out.

McAdoo just has the wrong idea.

I don’t understand how 50% of our plays aren’t screen/handoff/direct snaps to DJ and CMC.  
 

Let’s say it increases our off efficiency and we have an additional 12 plays per game. That’s be about a 15-20% increase on our current plays per game. So you’re at 18 touches per player per game. That should be easily doable. Why’d we sign DJ if we’re not making him the focus of our gameplan. I get if you want to limit CMC. But getting the ball in DJs hands 15-20x per game should be a priority. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tbe Grand Master

Tbe

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't think McAdoo's offense has been simplistic at his past jobs.

That said, I haven't been impressed with what I've seen so far of his Panthers offense.

Giants fans on twitter are saying this is exactly who he is. Don’t know….

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-Clown Veteran

X-Clown

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Quarterback is not our problem.  Teams with lesser QB's are finding ways to win.  The Falcons put up 27 on the Rams with Marcus Mariota at QB.  The Cowboys score 20 with Cooper Rush.  The Browns scored 30 with Brissett.

Honestly tired of the excuse that QB is our problem.  Rivera won five games with Kyle freaking Allen as his starting QB.  I'm not saying we're going deep in the playoffs with Baker as our QB.  I'm not sure Baker is the guy.  But he's not the reason we are where we are.

 

And yet, I'm seeing and hearing actual people that are suggesting we go back to Darnold when he's healthy. It's unbelievable.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

And yet, I'm seeing and hearing actual people that are suggesting we go back to Darnold when he's healthy. It's unbelievable.

If we are 0-4,0-5 when Darnold gets healthy he will see the field again, its just a matter of time. 

We dont have a chance anyway with this coaching staff, we could have prime Peyton Manning baack there and he would struggle to pass for 1 TD each game. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Emanuel McNeil Warren + Jacob Rodriguez

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • MHS831
      Panthers WR Xavier Legette named potential trade candidate for 2026 offseason

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • rebelrouser
      Schrader / Jeremiah mock draft experiment

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...