Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC injury status?


The Lobo
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, frankw said:

Anyone remember CJ Anderson? It's crazy how we moved on from Ron Rivera for who we thought was going to be a young and innovative mind only to see ourselves fall victim to the same stubborn shenanigans.

Yes I believe we cut him, he signed with the Rams and ran for 300 yards in the last 2 regular season games

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he doesn’t play, I don’t want to hear any excuses about this being the reason our offense fails or for yet another loss in the Matt Rhule era that absolves him and our OC (or QB) of any responsibility. I watched tennesee and Minnesota’s offense work just fine without their lead backs at stages last year. Even two years ago, Mike Davis was able to carry the load without that much of a drop off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, jamos14 said:

 

We hardly win when he is on the field.

 

 

Honestly, even counting Rivera, this team hasn’t experienced much success with the offense centered around CMC.

The current success model is finding what you think is a forward thinking coach, a QB (whether winnable-with or franchise), meanwhile nesting the top WRs ie Chase/Burrow, Waddle/Hill, Brown/Smith, Evans/Godwin, Kupp/Robinson, Diggs/Davis.

Last year’s Super Bowl wouldn’t have been those teams without Kupp (the real 21 mvp) and Chase.

We’re on year 5ish jamming this square peg into a round hole w/Christian.

I know people think WR isn’t a problem but I see a glaring hole as big as QB and HC. The whole franchise needs to restructure how the offense is built. Well it isn’t even built anyways, no real vision, distinct features or identity.

Root and stem. Minus a few obvious players.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Coreyl90 said:

I would imagine he will play Sunday. You don't show your cards to the media and allow Kingsbury and company to game plan for what's coming

I'm sure they're quaking in their cleats and staying up at night trying to figure out our offense that resembles something my six year old would scratch out in crayon on a napkin.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, davos said:

Honestly, even counting Rivera, this team hasn’t experienced much success with the offense centered around CMC.

The current success model is finding what you think is a forward thinking coach, a QB (whether winnable-with or franchise), meanwhile nesting the top WRs ie Chase/Burrow, Waddle/Hill, Brown/Smith, Evans/Godwin, Kupp/Robinson, Diggs/Davis.

Last year’s Super Bowl wouldn’t have been those teams without Kupp (the real 21 mvp) and Chase.

We’re on year 5ish jamming this square peg into a round hole w/Christian.

I know people think WR isn’t a problem but I see a glaring hole as big as QB and HC. The whole franchise needs to restructure how the offense is built. Well it isn’t even built anyways, no real vision, distinct features or identity.

Root and stem. Minus a few obvious players.

Building around a RB is stupid as fug.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CMC is a phenomenon 

can’t help the club in the tub however 

two years in the tub….hard to care honestly 

they have 3 running backs and don’t use any of them correctly so …..does it matter 

not popular I know but they should find  a way to work the compensation and get a 2 and a 3 for him from a contender   San Diego.  LA.  Come to mind  better for everybody 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...