Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Cardinals at Panthers GameDay Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think we matchup well with the Cards.  I also think we have an improved O line and the run game looks good.  The reality is that we are good in the right areas.  Now whether the coach can manage the game correctly we will see. 

We win if Baker doesn't poo the bed.

Edited by TheMaulClaw
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheMaulClaw said:

I think we matchup well with the Cards.  I also think we have an improved O line and the run game looks good.  The reality is that we are good in the right areas.  Now whether the coach can manage the game correctly we will see. 

We win if Baker doesn't poo the bed.

Make no mistake, there is more than one way for us to poo the bed in this game.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

My man!? You have reached the pit of despair. I'm almost there with ya.

Ha!  Brotato, I’ve seen it all.  From sitting on the grass in Death Valley to feeling the stands tremble under my feet in Charlotte.  The heat and humidity of Spartanburg in August to the biting cold of a home playoff game.

The incredible highs and the devastating lows are all pieces of the whole…

But this?  Whatever tf “this” is?

Comedy Sketch GIF by NETFLIX 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Navy_football said:

Personally don't even care if the team wins or loses at this point. I just want to see improvement from the offense. Can we please just have a competent looking offense for once? God? Please!

Well, in theory improvement on offense should just flat out lead to victory. Almost without question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, L-TownCat said:

Ha!  Brotato, I’ve seen it all.  From sitting on the grass in Death Valley to feeling the stands tremble under my feet in Charlotte.  The heat and humidity of Spartanburg in August to the biting cold of a home playoff game.

The incredible highs and the devastating lows are all pieces of the whole…

But this?  Whatever tf “this” is?

Comedy Sketch GIF by NETFLIX 

Jim Mora Playoffs GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must say, the fact that we have beat them so much over the years has me even more worried about this game, most people on here are confident we beat them because of how many times we have already, but I’m a big believer in what goes up must come down and they are due for a win against us and will be hungry. 
 

I hope I’m wrong but I’m just a big numbers guy and las of averages says we can’t keep beating the same team forever 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...