Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Cardinals at Panthers GameDay Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Hey look everyone another moron is making a gay joke in an attempt to degrade someone

Pretty soon the team will be school yard fighting like this in the locker room. YAY!! Another great start to a Panthers football season and the frustrated immature venting from the fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Pimpdaddy said:

...he was best available...I get it...when ur swingin for a qb...he was next in line...

Yeah, that is kind of my thought.  Rhule was desperate and decided to shoot the moon so to speak.  He started out making bad decisions and every decision regarding qb has compounded the initial bad decision.  Didn't work out, and it is going to cost him his job.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Davidson Deac II said:

Yeah, that is kind of my thought.  Rhule was desperate and decided to shoot the moon so to speak.  And every decision regarding qb has compounded the initial bad decision.  Didn't work out, and it is going to cost him his job.  

...lets hope so...we could of won today with any kind of competence .... in any offensive facet of the game..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, scratched said:

We ran the football “13” times. In 4 quarters of football!  I don’t care what anyone says, 13 rushing attempts is a disaster! And that’s on coaching!!!! 

NE has GB in OT with a 3rd string QB! Somebody needs to be fired.. and do it tonight, no reason to wait!

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...